Are we justified in our fights to save endangered species?

Even under the most optiÂmistic climate-​​change sceÂnarios, species loss may reach 30 perÂcent by the end of the cenÂtury, according to Ronald SanÂdler, assoÂciate proÂfessor of phiÂlosÂophy in the ColÂlege of Social SciÂences and HumanÂiÂties.
In "," a new book pubÂlished by CamÂbridge UniÂverÂsity Press, SanÂdler argues that rapidly changing ecosystem conÂdiÂtions make it unfeaÂsible and ethÂiÂcally inapÂproÂpriate to mainÂtain species preserÂvaÂtion as a priÂmary ecosystem manÂageÂment goal.
"In many cases, the more jusÂtiÂfied thing to do is to let sysÂtems tranÂsiÂtion and reconÂfigure," said SanÂdler, the director of NorthÂeastern University's Ethics InstiÂtute.
Many of the curÂrent conÂserÂvaÂtion efforts remain approÂpriate, according to SanÂdler, including proÂtecting the wilderÂness and estabÂlishing wildlife corÂriÂdors. But he said efforts to preÂserve species endanÂgered by cliÂmate change are a costly and inefÂfecÂtive protocol.
This stance is part of the book's broader disÂcusÂsion of the value of species and the ethÂical sigÂnifÂiÂcance of species boundÂaries in the areas of enviÂronÂmental conÂserÂvaÂtion and biotechÂnology. In the latter case, issues of species modÂiÂfiÂcaÂtion and the creÂation of new species through genetic engiÂneering are essential.
"There is nothing intrinÂsiÂcally probÂlemÂatic with genetic modÂiÂfiÂcaÂtion," SanÂdler said. "The imporÂtant ethÂical quesÂtion isn't 'Is it genetÂiÂcally modÂiÂfied,' but rather other issues like human rights and public health."
To explain his viewÂpoint, he used the example of two disÂtinct genetÂiÂcally modÂiÂfied organÂisms with vastly difÂferent social impliÂcaÂtions. The first is a genetÂiÂcally modÂiÂfied grass creÂated to improve golf fairway conÂdiÂtions that's resisÂtant to herÂbiÂcide and can quickly spread to other areas. The organism has the potenÂtial to be ecoÂlogÂiÂcally disÂrupÂtive and benÂeÂfits golfers almost exclusively.
On the other hand, a genetÂiÂcally modÂiÂfied yeast strain creÂated to proÂduce artemisinic acid, a preÂcursor to an effecÂtive antiÂmalarial drug, helps people in low-​​income counÂtries by addressing their basic health needs.
When you look at the comÂplete ethÂical picÂture of biotechÂnoloÂgies, SanÂdler said, "the fact that they are genetÂiÂcally modÂiÂfied is not that significant."
With respect to humans, many people have argued that the Homo sapiens species has speÂcial moral sigÂnifÂiÂcance that sets it apart from other species. SanÂdler, on the other hand, believes that value is found in the cogÂniÂtive and psyÂchoÂlogÂical charÂacÂterÂisÂtics of human beings and not in the species itself.
SupÂpose a new species were to emerge through bioÂmedÂical research that had comÂpaÂrable abilÂiÂties to empathize, think, feel and underÂstand the way humans do. For SanÂdler, this bioÂengiÂneered species would be conÂsidÂered as valuÂable as the human species.
"What matÂters are the capacÂiÂties that indiÂvidual human beings have," he said. "The reason we should be more conÂcerned about the welÂfare of a human being isn't because it's Homo sapiens but because of their cogÂniÂtive and psyÂchoÂlogÂical capacities."
Provided by Northeastern University