UK becomes first country to declare a 'climate emergency'

On Wednesday night a bipartisan UK Parliament passed an extraordinary measure: of an Environment and Climate Emergency.
The UK is the first national government to declare such an emergency. The decision marks a renewed sense of urgency in tackling climate change, following a visit to Parliament by teenage activist , the broadcast of David Attenborough's documentary and 11 days of protest by environmental group Extinction Rebellion that .
There are now some living under national, city and local declarations of a climate emergency around the world.
What is a climate emergency?
While there is no precise definition of what constitutes action to meet such an emergency, the move has been likened to putting the country on a "", with climate and the environment at the very centre of all government policy, rather than being on the fringe of political decisions.
The UK are legally committed to a 80% reduction in carbon emissions by 2050 (relative to their 1990 levels) and was recently recognised as one of just 18 developed economies that have driven down carbon dioxide emissions .
Some city and local councils have set out their climate emergency policies to become built around renewable energy supplies, more energy-efficient housing and a host of other measures. Yesterday's decision in Parliament implies further national reductions and investment in this space.
Counting down to 2030
The year 2030 is an important target. In spite of what climate contrarians might voice very loudly, have occurred since 2010, whilst 2018 experienced all manner of climate extremes that broke numerous global records.
It's sobering to realise that, because the oceans are a major sink of heat, the estimated 40-year delay in the release of this energy back into the atmosphere means the conditions of the last decade are in part a consequence of our .
With the planet to experience further warming from the heat held by the oceans, there is increasing international focus on meeting the United Nation's which was signed by 197 countries in 2016. This ground-breaking agreement has the ambitious global aim of preventing global temperatures from reaching 2ËšC above pre-industrial levels (the late nineteenth century) by 2100, and ideally should be no more than 1.5ËšC.
A report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the IPCC) has suggested that meeting this target means annual global carbon emissions must effectively , and then fall to zero by 2050. This is a target the UK opposition party Labour are .
More recent studies suggest even more ambitious cuts may be required.
The cost of inaction
Research in Australia has investigated to the global economy if the Paris Agreement is not met and the world hits 4ËšC warmer.
The values are eye-watering: an estimated US$23 trillion a year over the long-term. This has been likened to the world experiencing four to six global financial crises on the scale of 2008 .
In Australia, the cost would be on the order of A$159 billion a year, with most of the losses caused by drought-driven collapses in agricultural productivity and sea level rise. The expense to each Australian household has been put at the order of A$14,000.
The declaration of climate emergency by the UK comes at a crucial time in Australia, just two weeks out from a federal election. While the major parties have made public statements of support for the Paris Agreement, it remains unclear whether current and leaders are fully aware of their obligations.
At a time when politicians discuss the need to "live within our means" when it comes to national finances, this does not appear to translate to the environment when we're considering future generations.
Instead we seem to be caught in a debate surrounding the costs of action rather than . The next generation of Australian voters certainly don't seem confident about political commitments to their future as they hold their .
The welcome announcement from the UK is a major step in the right direction and potentially a watershed moment for a more sustainable global future. Is it too much to hope Australia could follow next?
Provided by The Conversation
This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .