Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

March 27, 2020

The unintended consequences of stockpiling: food waste

Credit: CC0 Public Domain
× close
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

There's now £1 billion more food in people's houses than three weeks ago. This consumer stockpiling has led to unavailability of products for others, and there's a real danger that if this food isn't eaten, we will see huge amounts of food waste.

Increase in avoidable waste

Richard Wilding OBE, Professor of Supply Chain Management at Cranfield School of Management, says UK supply chains are well organised: "There is no immediate risk of stocking-out for long periods, if consumers purchase normally and only buy what is needed. Food waste occurs anywhere along the and some of it is unavoidable. Around one-third of food for human consumption gets lost or wasted globally, around 1.3 billion tonnes a year. Most of this occurs when it reaches consumers and what is happening with panic buying is a potential increase of avoidable waste at the end of the chain, after purchase."

Consumers have a role to play

Emel Aktas, Professor of Supply Chain Analytics, says: "An immediate risk of increased food waste, especially for fresh produce, now exists. If freezing is not practised with discipline, we are in immediate danger of increasing food waste since most of the products have a shelf life of four to seven days. This is the costliest, most detrimental outcome to the environment—we have used natural resources for the product itself and for its packaging, and emitted CO2 to make it available on the shelf for purchase."

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters — to customize your preferences!

Switching the supply chains

Stockpiling can be driven by people worrying that food supplies are running low. But Professor Richard Wilding says that this isn't the pressing issue: "Food is available, it's just in the wrong place. For instance, restaurants and bars aren't taking and that is having to be diverted to other supply chains. To switch the food to other supply chain channels, the biggest challenge is capacity—in terms of vehicles, drivers, warehousing, storage, and other logistics."

Biggest surplus is in the home

Professor Wilding says, "The worst place we see surplus is in the home—this is the most wasteful area, where people throw away unused food."

Professor Aktas continued: "Buying more than can be consumed within the of the product generates the costliest food which can be avoided by behaviour change: our food choices, food shopping practices, and how much we think about what will happen to the food we buy—if we cannot consume it in time. It starts and ends with us—consumers."

Forecasting the supply chain

Professor Wilding says that supply chain forecasting is now down to guesswork. "There is potential for increased levels of food surplus, as forecasting algorithms were developed in a more stable time. But the current volatility means that supply chain teams have to guess levels of demand.

"There are only two types of forecasting—lucky ones and wrong ones. We are probably at a time where some people may have been lucky."

Action for consumers

As outlined on the Food Standards Agency website:

Provided by Cranfield University

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.