Â鶹ÒùÔº

If you were to stack up all the electronic waste produced annually around the world it would weigh as much as all the commercial aircrafts ever produced, or 5,000 Eiffel towers. This is a growing "tsunami" , and it's fed by all the phones, tablets and other electronic devices that are thrown away each day.

Of the 44.7 million metric tonnes of electronic waste (often shortened to "e-waste") produced around the world in 2017, 90% was sent to landfill, incinerated, or illegally traded. Europe and the US accounted for almost half of this—the EU is predicted to produce 12 million tonnes in 2020 alone. If nothing is done to combat the problem, the world is expected to produce more than 120 million tonnes annually by 2050.

Rich countries in Europe and North America export much of their e-waste to developing countries in Africa and Asia. A lot of this ends up accumulating in landfills, where toxic metals leach out and enter groundwater and food chains, threatening human health and the environment.

As daunting as this problem seems, we're working on a solution. Using a process called bioleaching, we're extracting and recycling these metals from e-waste using non-toxic bacteria.

Treasure from waste

It might surprise you to learn that those toxic metals are actually very valuable. It's a bitter irony that the e-waste mountains collecting in the world's poorest places actually contain a fortune. Precious metals are found in your phone and computer, and each year are used to manufacture new electronic devices. E-waste is thought to contain , and could be used to manufacture new products if it could be recycled safely.

With an estimated worth of , the economic benefits of recycling e-waste are clear. And it would help meet the shortfall for new natural resources that are needed to manufacture new products. Some of the elements on a printed circuit board—essentially the brain of a computer—are raw materials .

Other elements found in electronics are considered some of the periodic table's . There is a serious threat that they will be depleted within the next century. With today's , natural sources of indium will be depleted in about 10 years, platinum in 15 years and silver in 20 years.

But recovering these materials is more difficult than you might imagine.

Pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy are the current technologies used for extracting and recycling e-waste metals. They involve high temperatures and toxic chemicals, and so are extremely harmful to the environment. They require lots of energy and produce large volumes of toxic gas too, creating more pollution and leaving a large carbon footprint.

But bioleaching has existed as a solution to these problems as far back as the era of the Roman Empire. The modern mining industry has relied on it for decades, using microbes—mainly bacteria, but also some fungi—to extract metals from ores.

Microorganisms chemically modify the metal, setting it free from the surrounding rock and allowing it to dissolve in a microbial soup, from which the metal can be isolated and purified. Bioleaching requires very little energy and so has a small carbon footprint. No toxic chemicals are used either, making it environmentally friendly and safe.

Despite how useful it is, applying bioleaching to e-waste has mostly been an academic pursuit. But our is leading the first industrial effort. In a , we reported how we managed to extract copper from discarded computer circuit boards using this method and recycle it into high-quality foil.

Different metals have different properties, so new methods must be constantly developed. Extracting metals by bioleaching, though pollution-free, is also slower than the traditional methods. Thankfully though, genetic engineering has already shown how efficiently these microbes can be used in green recycling.

After our success recycling metals from discarded computers, scientists are trying other types of e-waste, including electric batteries. But developing better recycling techniques is only one piece of the puzzle. For a completely circular economy, recycling should start with manufacturers and producers. Designing devices that are more easily recycled and tackling the throw-away culture that treats the growing problem with indifference are both equally vital in slowing the oncoming tsunami.