Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


Curb climate change the easy way: Don't cut down big trees

Curb climate change the easy way: don’t cut down big trees
A mix of public and private forests in Oregon’s Coast Range. Credit: Beverly Law,

Protecting forests is an essential strategy in the fight against climate change that has not received the attention it deserves. Trees capture and store massive amounts of carbon. And unlike some strategies for cooling the climate, they don't require costly and complicated technology.

Yet although , protecting and restoring existing forests rarely attracts the same level of support. As an example, protection was notably missing from the US$447 million , which the U.S. Congress passed in December 2020 to jump-start technological capture and storage.

In our work as and scientists, we track carbon emissions from forests to wood products and all the way to landfills—and from . Our research shows that protecting carbon in forests is essential for meeting global climate goals.

Ironically, we see the U.S. as a model. This program, which was created after the 1973 oil crisis to guard against future supply disruptions, stores nearly 800 million gallons of oil in huge underground salt caverns along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. We propose creating strategic forest carbon reserves to store carbon as a way of stabilizing the climate, much as the Strategic Petroleum Reserve helps to stabilize oil markets.

Carbon stockpiles that grow

Forests pull about one-third of all human-caused carbon dioxide emissions from the atmosphere each year. Researchers have calculated that ending deforestation and allowing mature forests to keep growing could .

Curb climate change the easy way: don’t cut down big trees
The U.S. has more than 800 million acres of natural and planted forests and woodlands, of which nearly 60% are privately owned. Credit:

Half of a tree's stems, branches and roots are composed of carbon. Live and dead , along with forest soil, hold the equivalent of .

Trees accumulate carbon over extremely long periods of time. For example, redwoods, Douglas firs and western red cedars in the coastal forests of the Pacific Northwest can live for . When they die and decompose, much of that carbon ends up in soil, where it is stored for centuries or millennia.

Mature trees that have reached full root, bark and canopy development deal with climate variability better than young trees. Older trees also store more carbon. , which usually are hundreds of years old, store enormous quantities of carbon in their wood, and accumulate more carbon annually.

There are many fallacies about forest carbon storage, such as the concern that wildfires in the American West are into the atmosphere. In fact, fires are a relatively small carbon source. For example, the massive Biscuit Fire, which burned 772 square miles in southwest Oregon in 2002, emitted .

Another false claim is that it's OK from a climate perspective to cut trees and turn them into furniture, plywood and other items because can . These assertions fail to count from logging and manufacturing, which can be substantial.

The wood products industry releases carbon in many ways, from manufacturing products and burning mill waste to the breakdown of short-lived items like paper towels. It takes decades to centuries for newly planted forests to accumulate the carbon storage levels of mature and old forests, and many planted forests are .

Curb climate change the easy way: don’t cut down big trees
This old-growth forest in Opal Creek, Ore., where some trees are 500 years old or more, stores huge quantities of carbon. Credit: Beverly Law, CC BY-ND

In a review that we conducted with colleagues in 2019, we found that overall, U.S. state and federal reporting . We analyzed Oregon carbon emissions from wood that had been harvested over the past century and discovered that 65% of the original carbon returned to the atmosphere as CO2. Landfills retained 16%, while just 19% remained in .

In contrast, protecting high carbon-density western U.S. forests that have low vulnerability to mortality from drought or fire would sequester the equivalent of about of fossil fuel emissions from the entire western U.S., from the Rocky Mountain states to the Pacific coast.

Focus on big trees

In a recently published analysis of carbon storage in six national forests in Oregon, we showed why a strategic forest carbon reserve program should . Big trees, with trunks more than 21 inches in diameter, make up just 3% of these forests but store 42% of the above-ground carbon. Globally, a 2018 study found that the largest-diameter 1% of trees hold .

Findings like these are spurring interest in the idea of —keeping existing forests intact and letting them grow to their full potential. Advocates see proforestation as an effective, immediate and low-cost strategy to store carbon. Older forests are more resilient to than tree plantations, which are more susceptible to drought and severe wildfires. Like the 2,000-year-old redwoods in California that have , many tree species in old forests have lived through past climate extremes.

Creating forest carbon reserves would also conserve critical habitat for many types of wildlife that are threatened by human activities. Connecting these reserves to other parks and refuges could help species that need to migrate in response to climate change.

Less than 3% of land conserved in the Northeast U.S. is forever-wild. The Northeast Wilderness Trust is working with landowners, volunteers, and other conservation organizations to rewild the Northeastern landscape.

Using forests to meet climate goals

More than half of U.S. forested lands , so strategic forest carbon reserves should be established on both public and private lands. The challenge is paying for them, which will require a major shift in government and societal priorities. We believe that transferring public investment in oil and gas subsidies to pay private land owners to keep their forests growing could act as a for private land owners.

Many researchers and conservation advocates have called for comprehensive actions to slow climate change and reduce species losses. One prominent example is the , which seeks to . In an executive order on Jan. 27, 2021, President Biden directed his administration to develop plans for conserving at least 30% of by 2030.

Recent projections show that to prevent the worst impacts of climate change, governments will have to increase their pledges to reduce by . We see the next 10 to 20 years as a critical window for climate action, and believe that permanent protection for mature and old forests is the greatest opportunity for near-term benefits.

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .The Conversation

Citation: Curb climate change the easy way: Don't cut down big trees (2021, April 7) retrieved 28 May 2025 from /news/2021-04-curb-climate-easy-dont-big.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Coastal flooding enhances methane buildup in forests

324 shares

Feedback to editors