Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


Things look worse for casual workers than at any time during the pandemic

Things look worse for casual workers than at any time during the pandemic

At the national Australia Day ceremony in 2021, Prime Minister Scott Morrison spoke of the contribution by frontline workers during the pandemic. He health workers, the defense forces, the police and farmers, as well as "the truck drivers, the wholesale and the retail workers keeping our supermarket shelves stocked."

In his only defense personnel and got a mention—possibly due to the disappearing government support for retail and logistics workers during the Omicron wave.

With Omicron crippling supply chains and businesses being forced to shut due to lack of staff, eligibility rules for the last remaining COVID-related support payment (the ) have been tightened, and the payments available cut.

The definition "" has been weakened and tens of thousands of workers have been made by now being classified as "essential."

Many frontline workers—namely those on casual contracts—are facing the toughest circumstances since the the pandemic began.

With no right to guaranteed minimum hours, or the other entitlements, those employed as casual workers or as subcontractors are likely to lose income—either due to having to take time off to get tested or self-isolate, or because their workplace hasn't got enough staff to stay open. There is also a much higher proportion of casual workers in the retail sector, .

on the effects of the pandemic on income and conditions for workers between March 2020 and September 2021 shows 55% of those working in retail, fast-food and distribution were forced to take time off work for COVID-related reasons—with a significant percentage losing income as a result.

During this time just 1% of retail workers were diagnosed with COVID-19, and the the financial support available included the lockdown-specific .

Now, with infection rates running significantly higher—a quarter of Coles warehouse staff, for example, have been reported —there's less support.

Casual retail workers thus face losing hours, being put at greater risk of contracting COVID-19, and dealing with abusive customers over mask, QR code and other requirements.

What our survey showed

The purpose of of nearly 1,160 retail, and distribution workers was to gauge how the pandemic had affected employment and income.

Things look worse for casual workers than at any time during the pandemic
Credit: The Conversation·Source: Australian National University & University of Sydney

Polling company Ipsos conducted the survey in September 2021, during the peak of Sydney's Delta wave (which sparked suburb-based lockdowns in mid-July 2021) and the start of Melbourne's Delta wave (with the Andrews government declaring a lockdown on August 5, 2021).

The survey was nationally representative. About 61% of respondents were women, 44% were younger than 30, and 19% were from a non-English-speaking background. About 39% were permanent full-time, 21% permanent part-time and 38% casuals (45% of women were casual, compared with 22% of men).

Because it was nationally representative, about 40% respondents were not in an lockdown area (NSW, Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory) at the time of the survey. This make the results even more stark compared with now.

From March 2020 to September 2021, 55% of retail, fast food and distribution workers had to take time off for a COVID-19 related reason:

  • 1% did so due to having COVID-19. Of these, about a third said they took unpaid leave.
  • 7% did so due to being a close contact of someone with COVID-19. Of these, 51% of permanent workers and 78% of casuals took unpaid leave.
  • 11% took time off because they had COVID-19 symptoms. Of these, 45% of permanent workers and 91% of casuals took unpaid leave.
  • 10% were absent due to working at an exposure location. Of these, 27% of permanent workers and 60% of casuals took unpaid leave.
  • 30% took time off because they had to take a COVID-19 test and isolate while waiting for a result. Of these, 42% of permanent workers and 89% of casuals took unpaid leave.

Clearly while very few workers were actually sick with COVID-19, it had a significant affect on livelihoods. This a key point to reflect on now more workers have COVID-19 and an even larger number are (or should be) isolating.

Short shift for precarious work

At the time of our survey the risks of catching COVID-19 were relatively small, even for essential frontline workers.

Omicron has substantially increased that risk—along with the risk of losing work hours.

Registering a positive result is the only way ill, casually employed workers can access extra support when they aren't able to work. But getting a test— has been difficult, with workers in NSW and Victoria only been able to officially register positive RAT results since January 10.

The Pandemic Leave Disaster Payment is still available to those who don't qualify for employer-paid leave. But to qualify you must be directed to isolate and stay at home due to having tested positive or been in close contact with someone with COVID-19.

You also for the full $750 a week (for two weeks) if you lose 20 hours or more of paid work a week. If you lose 8-19 hours, you get $450 a week. If you lose less than eight hours, you get nothing.

This highlights the precarious and unsustainable position of Australians employed on casual contracts, especially those in the retail, fast food and distribution sector. Many unwell or at-risk precarious workers are likely to have gone without income while they struggle to get access to tests or lose paid work for other reasons.

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .The Conversation

Citation: Things look worse for casual workers than at any time during the pandemic (2022, February 1) retrieved 16 July 2025 from /news/2022-02-worse-casual-workers-pandemic.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Workplace transmissions: a predictable result of the class divide in worker rights

11 shares

Feedback to editors