Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

December 27, 2024

How land use changes could boost China's carbon sequestration potential

Comparison of China’s land use change carbon budget (LULUCF) based on different data sources. Positive values indicate carbon sources, while negative values indicate carbon sinks. a. LULUCF carbon flux from 1980 to 2100. b. Multi-year average LULUCF carbon flux from 1994 to 2018. c. Estimates of forest area in China based on different data sources. Credit: Nature Communications (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54846-2
× close
Comparison of China’s land use change carbon budget (LULUCF) based on different data sources. Positive values indicate carbon sources, while negative values indicate carbon sinks. a. LULUCF carbon flux from 1980 to 2100. b. Multi-year average LULUCF carbon flux from 1994 to 2018. c. Estimates of forest area in China based on different data sources. Credit: Nature Communications (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54846-2

A team of researchers led by Professor Piao Shilong at the Institute of Carbon Neutrality of Peking University (PKU) has made significant advances in understanding how China's land-use changes—such as forest planting—can contribute to the country's efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

Their study, in Nature Communications, offers fresh insights into China's carbon removal capacity through land-use, , and forestry (LULUCF), a key strategy for achieving carbon neutrality by 2060.

As part of its commitment under the Paris Agreement, China has pledged to become by 2060, meaning it will need to balance the amount of carbon dioxide it emits with the amount it can remove from the atmosphere. One important way to achieve this balance is through land-based solutions, particularly forestation, which helps capture and store carbon.

However, there has been uncertainty about how much carbon China's forests can actually sequester due to varying estimates and models. This new research helps clarify the role of land-use changes in China's carbon budget and provides more accurate projections for future carbon removal.

Key findings

Comparison of anthropogenic carbon fluxes from Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry (LULUCF) estimated by different methods. Credit: Nature Communications (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54846-2
× close
Comparison of anthropogenic carbon fluxes from Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry (LULUCF) estimated by different methods. Credit: Nature Communications (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54846-2

This study offers more precise estimates of China's carbon removal from land-use changes by using an improved modeling approach. The researchers used a version of the OSCAR model specifically tailored for China (OSCAR-China) to better reflect the country's land-use changes. This new model integrates both direct and indirect effects of land-use changes, offering a clearer picture of how much carbon China's forests are actually capturing.

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters — to customize your preferences!

The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers as they look to enhance China's carbon sequestration strategies. While forestation is an important tool for reducing emissions, the study also stresses that China cannot rely solely on land-use changes to meet its carbon neutrality goal. Ongoing efforts across all sectors, including energy and industry, will be necessary to reduce emissions on a larger scale.

Furthermore, the research underlines the importance of improving carbon accounting methods to ensure that land-based carbon sequestration is accurately measured.

The paper, titled "Future Land Carbon Removals in China Consistent with National Inventory," was co-authored by He Yue, Assistant Researcher at Peking University, and Professors Piao Shilong and Thomas Gasser from IIASA.

More information: Yue He et al, Future land carbon removals in China consistent with national inventory, Nature Communications (2024).

Journal information: Nature Communications

Provided by Peking University

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.