Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


Explaining physical reality: Âé¶¹ÒùÔºicists 'bootstrap' validity of string theory

Âé¶¹ÒùÔºicists 'Bootstrap' validity of string theory
Visualization of the allowed values of "dial settings" in the scattering amplitudes that describe the probability for particles to interact in the models introduced in this new work. Credit: Âé¶¹ÒùÔºical Review Letters (2024). DOI: 10.1103/Âé¶¹ÒùÔºRevLett.133.251601

String theory, conceptualized more than 50 years ago as a framework to explain the formation of matter, remains elusive as a "provable" phenomenon. But a team of physicists has now taken a significant step forward in validating string theory by using an innovative mathematical method that points to its "inevitability."

String theory posits that the most basic building blocks of nature are not particles, but, rather, one-dimensional vibrating strings that move at different frequencies in determining the type of particle that emerges—akin to how vibrations of string instruments produce an array of musical notes.

In their work, in the journal Âé¶¹ÒùÔºical Review Letters, New York University and Caltech researchers posed the following question: "What is the math question to which is the only answer?" This approach to understanding physics is known as the "bootstrap," which is reminiscent of the adage about "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps"—producing results without additional assistance or, in this case, input.

The bootstrap has previously allowed physicists to understand why and various particle theories—like the interactions of gluons inside of protons—are mathematically inevitable: they are the only consistent mathematical structures, under certain criteria.

However, the same question had not previously been answered for string theory: What criteria uniquely determine it by mathematically picking it out from the set of all possible theories?

In the paper, the scientists discovered a way to bootstrap these string amplitudes—specifically, constructing them through the creation of mathematical formulas. By implementing special mathematical conditions on their formulas for scattering amplitudes—which describe how particles interact and ultimately form—the group found that the amplitudes of string theory emerged as the only consistent answer.

"This paper provides an answer to this string-theory question for the first time," says Grant Remmen, a James Arthur Postdoctoral Fellow in NYU's Center for Cosmology and Particle Âé¶¹ÒùÔºics and one of the authors of the paper.

"Now that these mathematical conditions are known, it brings us a step closer to understanding if and why string theory must describe our universe."

The paper's authors, who also included Clifford Cheung, a professor of theoretical physics at Caltech, and Aaron Hillman, a Caltech postdoctoral researcher, add that this breakthrough may be useful in better understanding quantum gravity—it seeks to reconcile Einstein's theory of relativity, which explains large-scale gravity, with , which describes particle activity at the smallest scales.

"This approach opens a new area of study in analyzing the uniqueness of string amplitudes," explains Remmen. "The development of tools outlined in our research can be used to investigate deformations of string theory, allowing us to map a space of possibilities for ."

More information: Clifford Cheung et al, Bootstrap Principle for the Spectrum and Scattering of Strings, Âé¶¹ÒùÔºical Review Letters (2024).

Provided by New York University

Citation: Explaining physical reality: Âé¶¹ÒùÔºicists 'bootstrap' validity of string theory (2024, December 17) retrieved 10 June 2025 from /news/2024-12-physical-reality-physicists-bootstrap-validity.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Explaining gravity without string theory

170 shares

Feedback to editors