Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

January 10, 2025

Ethiopian Highlands study examines stone tool decision-making process in early human history

Left: experiential activity on long bone; Top right: imaging the experimental samples; Bottom right: map with the location of the study case (Melka Wakena). Credit: Eduardo Paixão, Map by Tegenu Gossa
× close
Left: experiential activity on long bone; Top right: imaging the experimental samples; Bottom right: map with the location of the study case (Melka Wakena). Credit: Eduardo Paixão, Map by Tegenu Gossa

An international study reveals how early humans, as far back as 1.5 million years ago, deliberately selected specific stones for their tools in the Ethiopian Highlands. The findings, in the journal PLOS ONE, provide insights into the cognitive abilities and technological expertise of our ancestors.

At the Melka Wakena site in the Ethiopian Highlands, researchers discovered a wide array of tools. But why were certain types of stone chosen over others? The answer lies in the properties of the rocks. Using state-of-the-art technologies, including robot-assisted experiments and imaging techniques, the team demonstrated that sought an optimal balance between functionality and durability.

The research relied on advanced technologies developed at the Laboratory for Traceology and Controlled Experiments (TraCEr). This laboratory is part of the Archaeological Research Center and Museum for Human Behavioral Evolution, MONREPOS, which is a department of the Leibniz-Zentrum für Archäologie (LEIZA) in Germany.

"Our research shows that the material properties of the stones—such as suitability, quality, and durability—were likely crucial factors in the selection process by ," explains study leader Dr. Eduardo Paixão from the University of Algarve, Portugal.

"This suggests that they had a deep understanding of their environment and made deliberate choices."

Dr. João Marreiros, head of the TraCEr Laboratory, adds, "The deliberate selection of materials influenced the surface changes of the tools. This demonstrates that differences in archaeological finds are not random."

Experimental mechanical setup (SMARTTESTER, manufactured by Inotec AP GmbH, with adaptations made by Walter Gneisinger) at TraCEr laboratory in Monrepos. Credit: Eduardo Paixão, Walter Gneisinger
× close
Experimental mechanical setup (SMARTTESTER, manufactured by Inotec AP GmbH, with adaptations made by Walter Gneisinger) at TraCEr laboratory in Monrepos. Credit: Eduardo Paixão, Walter Gneisinger

An international team deciphers early technologies

The study is the result of collaboration between the Interdisciplinary Center for Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior (ICArEHB) at the University of Algarve, the TraCEr Laboratory and the Imaging Plattform at LEIZA (IMPALA), and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Excavations at the site are led by Prof. Erella Hovers and Dr. Tegenu Gossa.

"These findings open new perspectives on understanding technological innovations in early human history," says the study leader. "We plan further research to better comprehend the complex decisions made by these early toolmakers."

More information: Eduardo Paixão et al, Exploring early Acheulian technological decision-making: A controlled experimental approach to raw material selection for percussive artifacts in Melka Wakena, Ethiopia, PLOS ONE (2025).

Journal information: PLoS ONE

Provided by Leibniz-Zentrum für Archäologie (LEIZA)

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

Research in the Ethiopian Highlands indicates that early humans, 1.5 million years ago, intentionally selected specific stones for tool-making based on their properties, such as functionality and durability. This suggests a sophisticated understanding of their environment and deliberate decision-making. The study utilized advanced technologies to demonstrate that material selection was crucial, influencing the tools' surface changes and indicating non-random archaeological findings.

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.