Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


Building sentence structure may be language-specific, brain activity study finds

Building sentence structure may be language-specific
Neural dynamics of incremental structure building in spoken language comprehension. Speech is segmented into words, which are incrementally integrated into a hierarchical syntactic structure with an interpretation. The amount of structure built at each word, quantified via incremental node count, is reflected in the dynamics of the network, which lead to a neural signal measurable with magnetoencephalography. Credit: PLOS Biology (2025). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002968

Do speakers of different languages build sentence structure in the same way? In a neuroimaging study in PLOS Biology, scientists from the Max Planck institute for Psycholinguistics, Donders Institute and Radboud University in Nijmegen recorded the brain activity of participants listening to Dutch stories. In contrast to English, sentence processing in Dutch was based on a strategy for predicting what comes next rather than a "wait-and-see" approach, showing that strategies may differ across languages.

While listening to spoken , people need to link abstract knowledge of grammar to the words they actually hear. Theories on how people build grammatical structure in real time are often based on English. In sentences such as "I have watched a documentary," the noun "documentary" immediately follows the verb. However, in Dutch sentences, the may be reversed: "Ik heb een documentaire gezien" ("I have a documentary watched.").

"To find out whether speakers of different languages build grammatical structure in the same way, it is important to look at languages that differ from English in such interesting respects," says first author Cas Coopmans. "Findings based on English may not generalize to languages that have different grammatical properties, such as Dutch."

Audiobook stories

To investigate how people build sentence structure in Dutch, the researchers measured the of 24 participants who listened to Dutch audiobook stories in a magnetoencephalography (MEG) scanner.

For every word in the audiobook, the researchers determined how much grammatical information could be built. A "top-down" strategy based on early prediction of upcoming was compared to a "bottom-up" strategy, based on integrating grammatical information at a later stage.

Predicting what comes next

Both sentence building strategies could predict activity in the major left hemisphere's language areas. But the effects were much stronger for predictive structure building.

While speakers of English seem to adopt a "wait-and-see" approach, speakers of Dutch are more likely to build sentences in a predictive manner. This means that speakers of different languages differ in how they build grammatical structure during language comprehension.

The researchers next want to apply this method to study other languages, as well as the role of different linguistic properties.

"Now that we know that we can use this method to study how people build grammatical structure during naturalistic spoken language comprehension, we can see how this process is influenced by other linguistic properties. In future work, we will investigate how the brain might use the prosodic properties of speech to extract the of spoken sentences," says Coopmans.

More information: Cas W. Coopmans et al, Language-specific neural dynamics extend syntax into the time domain, PLOS Biology (2025).

Journal information: PLoS Biology

Provided by Max Planck Society

Citation: Building sentence structure may be language-specific, brain activity study finds (2025, January 21) retrieved 18 June 2025 from /news/2025-01-sentence-language-specific-brain.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further


87 shares

Feedback to editors