Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

March 13, 2025

Can 'better' meat lead to sustainable diets?

Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain
× close
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Livestock production has long been associated with significant environmental impacts, prompting calls for sustainable transition in both production and consumption

A conducted by researchers at the University of Helsinki and the Stockholm Resilience Center at Stockholm University investigates the relationship between eating less meat and choosing higher-quality meat.

Researchers interviewed 21 Finnish consumers who purchase natural pasture-raised beef—meat from cattle that graze on biodiversity-rich, non-cultivated pastures, eating almost exclusively locally produced grass.

The work is published in the journal Agriculture and Human Values.

Dr. Irina Herzon, senior university lecturer and the study's lead author, explained, "We wanted to understand how consumers gaining access to 'better' meat rationalize their overall —whether they see a link between eating 'better' and eating 'less."'

All interviewees felt that meat can be part of a sustainable diet. Although most of them also acknowledged the need to reduce meat consumption globally, they often viewed reduction as more relevant elsewhere than in Finland.

Consumer choices were influenced by , naturalness, and meat origin. A strong preference was shown for domestically produced options, particularly Finnish beef, which was linked to the environment and local producers.

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters — to customize your preferences!

Perceptions of "better" meat varied, with being a key concern, though taste remained the primary purchasing factor. The relationship between "better" and "less" was ambiguous—some saw higher costs as a reason to eat less, while others used premium meat as justification for maintaining or increasing consumption.

The findings highlight the complexities of promoting sustainable diets through the "less but better" approach. The study underscores the need for clearer definitions of "better" meat in relation to sustainability and cultural preferences, as well as stronger guidance on how much "less" is necessary to meet sustainability targets.

Irina Herzon emphasizes the importance of addressing both aspects, "We need to encourage reduced meat consumption while also promoting high-quality, sustainable production options."

Further research is needed to define sustainable meat consumption criteria and to develop strategies for shifting consumer practices so that they align with the objectives of a sustainable food system.

More information: Rachel Mazac et al, Does "better" mean "less"? Sustainable meat consumption in the context of natural pasture-raised beef, Agriculture and Human Values (2025).

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
trusted source
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

The investigation into Finnish consumers' meat consumption reveals that while "better" meat, such as pasture-raised beef, is seen as part of a sustainable diet, the link between eating "better" and "less" meat is unclear. Preferences are influenced by health, naturalness, and origin, with a strong inclination towards domestic products. The study highlights the need for clearer definitions of "better" meat and guidance on reducing consumption to achieve sustainability goals.

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.