Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

March 21, 2025

Research society's self-evaluation finds gaps in diversity and inclusion among its members

Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain
× close
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

A new study reveals disparities in representation and inclusion among Sleep Research Society members, shedding light on the experiences of historically minoritized individuals within the organization. The findings highlight areas for improvement in fostering diversity, inclusion, and equitable participation in sleep and circadian societies.

The findings are in the journal Sleep Health.

Results show that while a majority of respondents (51%) felt welcomed within the SRS, 52% perceived a lack of inclusivity, and 65% noted a lack of diverse viewpoints represented. Participation in SRS activities varied, with 41% engaging in self-initiated efforts such as abstract submissions, and 56% reporting involvement in society-initiated activities like appointed positions.

However, members of historically minoritized groups, women, and sexual and gender-minoritized individuals were less likely to feel welcomed or perceive inclusivity compared with their counterparts.

"This study highlights critical disparities within the SRS, providing into the challenges faced by historically minoritized members," said lead author Dayna Johnson, who has a doctorate in epidemiology and is an associate professor in the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. "Acknowledging these gaps is the first step toward creating a more inclusive and supportive environment for all members."

The study involved a web-based questionnaire developed by the SRS Taskforce for Diversity and Inclusion, which was chaired by Namni Goel, Ph.D., senior author and SRS Immediate Past President. The assessed sociodemographic characteristics and SRS experiences, including participation in activities, perceptions of inclusiveness, and representation of diverse viewpoints.

Johnson noted that the results provide actionable insights to guide future diversity and initiatives within the SRS.

"Creating a culture of inclusion is vital for advancing science and ensuring that all voices are heard," Johnson said.

This study serves as a baseline for evaluating the impact of ongoing and future initiatives aimed at expanding opportunities for underrepresented individuals in the fields of sleep and circadian research.

More information: Dayna A. Johnson et al, Diversity, equity, and inclusion: Findings from the Sleep Research Society, Sleep Health (2024).

Provided by Sleep Research Society

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

A survey of Sleep Research Society members reveals significant gaps in diversity and inclusion, with 52% perceiving a lack of inclusivity and 65% noting insufficient diverse viewpoints. Members from historically minoritized groups, women, and sexual and gender minorities felt less welcomed. The findings underscore the need for improved diversity and inclusion efforts to foster equitable participation in sleep and circadian research.

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.