Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

April 16, 2025

For sales quota periods, one size doesn't fit all

Credit: Antoni Shkraba from Pexels
× close
Credit: Antoni Shkraba from Pexels

When it comes to stimulating sales, quotas are a tried-and-true tactic. But they don't always provide the lifts companies hope for. A 2022 survey by Salesforce found only 28% of sales professionals were hitting their quotas.

New research from Texas McCombs suggests one reason: varying attitudes toward time periods. Doug Chung, associate professor of marketing, finds that salespeople respond differently to quotas of different lengths based on how forward-looking and motivated they are.

The research is in the journal Marketing Science. Key takeaways include:

"Sales compensation works," Chung says. "It's a way to motivate people, and it does change people's behavior. But if I don't value the future at all, then there's no point in putting in effort in January for a December reward. People who are less motivated by the future need pacers. They need more constant motivation."

With Byungyeon Kim from the University of Minnesota and Byoung Park from the University at Albany, SUNY, Chung studied sales data from a Swedish electronics retailer with 100 retail stores.

The had been operating on a monthly quota cycle. But executives noticed a problem. If business was slow during the first week of a cycle—for example, if the weather was nice, and consumers spent time outdoors instead of shopping—salespeople didn't think they could reach their goals. As a result, they put in minimal effort for the rest of the month.

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters — to customize your preferences!

Midyear, in an effort to better motivate employees and boost sales, the company switched to daily quotas. Chung and colleagues compared sales data before and after the switch.

They discovered that after the quota cycle was shortened:

The findings suggest that when companies design sales compensation structures and schedules, one size may not fit all, Chung says. They should use short cycles to motivate low performers. But companies with many high performers will do better with longer cycles.

Time preferences are just one factor in structuring compensation, he notes. Quota cycles should also match sales cycles, which may differ from one industry to another. Long cycles may be disrupted if illness keeps people out of work.

Chung is currently studying the sales impacts of another option: letting salespeople self-select which compensation cycle they prefer.

"Some startups are doing this," he says. "But it's still rare because of the perception of fairness. In a company, you want a cohesive culture. Once comp is different, even if the salesperson selected it, they might question its fairness."

More information: Doug J. Chung et al, Time Dependence and Time Preference: Implications for Compensation Structure, Marketing Science (2025).

Journal information: Marketing Science

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

Sales quotas impact performance differently based on their duration and the motivation levels of salespeople. Shorter quota cycles can boost sales among less motivated individuals by providing frequent incentives, while longer cycles benefit those motivated by future rewards. A study of a Swedish retailer showed that switching from monthly to daily quotas increased sales among low performers but slightly decreased high performers' sales. Companies should tailor quota cycles to their workforce's motivation levels and industry-specific sales cycles.

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.