Â鶹ÒùÔº

, but I grew up in Oklahoma and Kansas, where my interest in the subject was sparked by visits to local museums.

I fondly remember trips to the in Wichita, Kansas, and the in Oklahoma City. A 1908 photograph of my great-grandparents picking cotton has been used as a poster by the Oklahoma Historical Society.

This love of learning history continued into my years as a graduate student of history, when I would spend hours at the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum learning about the history of human flight and ballooning. As a professor, I've integrated the institution's exhibits into my history courses.

The Trump administration, however, is not happy with the way the Smithsonian Institution and other U.S. museums are portraying history.

On March 27, 2025, the president issued an executive order, "," which asserted, "Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth. Under this historical revision, our Nation's unparalleled legacy of advancing liberty, individual rights, and human happiness is reconstructed as inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed."

Trump singled out a few museums, including the Smithsonian, dedicating a whole section of the order on "saving" the institution from "divisive, race-centered ideology."

Of course, history is contested. There will always be a variety of views about what should be included and excluded from America's story. For example, in my own research, I found that Prohibition-era school boards in the 1920s argued over whether it was appropriate for history textbooks to include pictures of soldiers drinking to illustrate .

But most recent debates center on how much attention should be given to the history of the nation's accomplishments over its darker chapters. The Smithsonian, as a national institution , has sometimes found itself in the crosshairs.

America's historical repository

The Smithsonian Institution was founded in 1846 thanks to its namesake, British chemist .

Smithson willed his estate to his nephew and stated that if his nephew died without an heir, the money—roughly —would be donated to the U.S. to found "an establishment for the increase and diffusion of knowledge."

The idea of a national institution dedicated to history, science and learning was contentious from the start.

In her book "," historian Nina Burleigh shows how Smithson's bequest was nearly lost due to battles between competing interests.

Southern plantation owners and western frontiersmen, including President Andrew Jackson, saw the establishment of a national museum as an unnecessary assertion of federal power. They also challenged the very idea of accepting a gift from a non-American and thought that it was beneath the dignity of the government to confer immortality on someone simply because of a large donation.

In the end, a group led by congressman and former president John Quincy Adams ensured Smithson's vision was realized. Adams felt that the country was failing to live up to its early promise. He thought a national museum was an important way to burnish the ideals of the young republic and educate the public.

Today the Smithsonian runs 14 education and research centers, the National Zoo and 21 museums, including the National Portrait Gallery and , which was created with bipartisan support during President George W. Bush's administration.

In the introduction to his book "," cultural anthropologist Richard Kurin talks about how the institution has also supported hundreds of small and large institutions outside of the nation's capital.

In 2024, on loan to museums in 52 U.S. states and territories and 33 foreign countries. It also partners with over 200 affiliate museums. YouGov has periodically tracked , which has held steady at roughly 68% approval and 2% disapproval since 2020.

Smithsonian in the crosshairs

Precursors to the Trump administration's efforts to reshape the Smithsonian took place in the 1990s.

In 1991, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, which was then known as the National Museum of American Art, created an exhibition titled "The West as America, Reinterpreting Images of the Frontier, 1820–920." that the museum portrayed western expansion as a tale of conquest and destruction, rather than one of progress and nation-building. that the exhibit represented "an entirely hostile ideological assault on the nation's founding and history."

The exhibition proved popular: Attendance to the National Museum of American Art was than it had been during the same period the year prior. But the debate raised questions about whether public museums were able to express ideas that are critical of the U.S. without risk of censorship.

In 1994, controversy again erupted, this time at the National Air and Space Museum over , the plane that dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima 50 years prior.

Should the exhibition explore the loss of Japanese lives? Or emphasize the U.S. war victory?

Veterans groups insisted that the atomic bomb ended the war and saved 1 million American lives, of photographs of the destruction and a melted Japanese school lunch box from the exhibit. Meanwhile, other activists by arguing that a symbol of human destruction shouldn't be commemorated at an institution that's supposed to celebrate human achievement.

Republicans won the House in 1994 and threatened cuts to the Smithsonian's budget over the Enola Gay exhibition, compelling . In the end, the fuselage of the Enola Gay was displayed in the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum. But the exhibit would not tell the full story of the plane's role in the war from a myriad of perspectives.

Trump enters the fray

In 2019, The New York Times , which aimed to reframe the country's history by placing slavery and its consequences at its very center. The first Trump administration quickly responded by forming its 1776 commission. In January 2021, it produced a report , claiming that an emphasis on the country's history of racism and slavery was counterproductive to promoting "patriotic education."

That same year, to build "a vast outdoor park that will feature the statues of the greatest Americans to ever live," with 250 statues to mark the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

President Joe Biden in 2021. Trump after retaking the White House, and pointed to figures he'd like to see included, such as Christopher Columbus, George Washington, Betsy Ross, Sitting Bull, Bob Hope, Thurgood Marshall and Whitney Houston.

I don't think there is anything wrong with honoring Americans, though I think a focus on celebrities and major figures clouds . I also find it troubling that there seems to be such a concerted effort to so forcefully shape the teaching and understanding of history via threats and bullying. Yale historian Jason Stanley how aspiring authoritarian governments seek to control historical narratives and discourage an exploration of the complexities of the past.

Historical scholarship requires an openness to debate and a willingness to embrace new findings and perspectives. It also involves the humility to accept that no one—least of all the government—has a monopoly on the truth.

In his executive order, Trump noted that "Museums in our Nation's capital should be places where individuals go to learn." I share that view. Doing so, however, means not dismantling history, but instead complicating the story—in all its messy glory.

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .