Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

May 19, 2025

Tackling social exclusion among young people requires a greater focus on group dynamics in schools, study shows

Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain
× close
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Efforts to reduce social exclusion in schools, such as being left out of a peer group or an activity, need to place greater emphasis on group dynamics and age-specific strategies, a new study shows.

Researchers from the University of Exeter found that are less likely than children to expect peers to challenge as a bystander, especially when they fear social consequences such as losing friends or upsetting group dynamics.

This suggests that anti-bullying programs will be more effective if they address the social and group-based pressures that influence bystander behavior—especially among older students.

The study, led by Dr. Ayşe Şule Yüksel alongside Dr. Sally Palmer, Eirini Argyri, and Professor Adam Rutland, involved 424 young people aged 8–10 and 13–15. Participants read scenarios in which a peer was excluded from an after-school club. Researchers asked how likely it was that a member would step in to challenge social exclusion.

The results revealed that adolescents had lower expectations of peer intervention than children did. When asked to explain their reasoning, adolescents were more likely to focus on group dynamics and social consequences—such as the risk of losing friendships or disrupting group cohesion—while children emphasized moral considerations —such as fairness and welfare—when evaluating the bystander's decision to act.

The research is in the British Journal of Developmental Psychology.

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters — to customize your preferences!

Dr. Yüksel said, "This study highlights how children and adolescents reason differently about standing up for others. Younger children tend to rely on like fairness, while adolescents are more aware of group norms and potential social risks.

"To promote positive bystander behavior, interventions must reflect these developmental differences. While morally driven approaches may be effective for children, adolescents may need support to critically examine group norms and learn how to navigate when challenging the social exclusion of others."

The study was conducted in several schools in multicultural areas of a large city in south-eastern England and included children from lower-middle class backgrounds. The exclusion scenarios involved both British and immigrant peers to explore the impact of intergroup and intragroup exclusion.

The researchers conclude that understanding the developmental and social reasoning behind behavior is key to designing effective school-based interventions that reduce social exclusion and promote inclusion.

More information: Ayşe Şule Yüksel et al, Children's and adolescents' expectations, evaluations and reasoning about a bystander who challenges social exclusion within intragroup and intergroup peer contexts, British Journal of Developmental Psychology (2024).

Provided by University of Exeter

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
trusted source
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

Adolescents are less likely than children to expect peers to challenge social exclusion, often due to concerns about group dynamics and social consequences. Children emphasize moral values like fairness, while adolescents focus on group norms. Effective interventions should address these developmental differences and target group-based pressures to promote inclusive bystander behavior.

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.