鶹Ժ

June 11, 2025

Same ecosystem, different fix: Study finds restoration requires localized approaches, not universal methods

Intact Mediterranean-type oak savanna (Tonzi Ranch), a research site of the University of California, Berke-ley, whose researchers contributed to the study. Credit: Sebastian Fiedler
× close
Intact Mediterranean-type oak savanna (Tonzi Ranch), a research site of the University of California, Berke-ley, whose researchers contributed to the study. Credit: Sebastian Fiedler

As the world focuses on repairing damaged ecosystems, especially with the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and new EU Nature Restoration law in place, a new study sounds a clear message: when it comes to restoring nature, one size doesn't fit all.

A team of scientists, led by the University of Göttingen and Freie Universität Berlin, found that even ecosystems that look similar on the surface can respond very differently to the same restoration methods. If we want to bring back nature in a way that helps absorb carbon, keep water in the ground, and recycle nutrients, policymakers need to think locally. The findings were in the journal Ecography.

In 2019, researchers from around the world joined forces to study how to best restore dry, Mediterranean-style landscapes—places with and dry summers, like parts of the Mediterranean, California, Chile, South Africa, and Australia. These regions are under serious environmental stress and urgently need support.

The team wanted to find out which combinations of native plants could best bring back the land's natural functions. Because these ecosystems are so vast and varied, they built a —which works like a strategy computer game for scientists—to test how different plant mixes would perform in different soils and climates.

Restoration of Mediterranean-type woodland with protected young trees, Valencian Community, Spain—researchers from this region contributed to the study. Credit: Sebastian Fiedler
× close
Restoration of Mediterranean-type woodland with protected young trees, Valencian Community, Spain—researchers from this region contributed to the study. Credit: Sebastian Fiedler

The model matched up well with real-world results from a large restoration project in southwestern Australia. In addition, it showed that trying to achieve all goals at once—storing more carbon, saving water, and holding on to nitrogen—is tough. Compromises are often needed, and what works best depends a lot on local soil and climate conditions.

"The great news is that this tool can help us choose the best plants for a , depending on what we want to achieve," said Dr. Sebastian Fiedler, Postdoctoral Researcher at Technische Universität Berlin, who led this research at Göttingen University and Freie Universität Berlin.

Fiedler continues, "But we're not done yet—right now, the model doesn't include things like wildfires, which are becoming more common and could change everything. That's our next step."

More information: Sebastian Fiedler et al, Trade‐offs among restored ecosystem functions are context‐dependent in Mediterranean‐type regions, Ecography (2025).

Journal information: Ecography

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

Ecosystems with similar appearances can respond differently to identical restoration methods, indicating that localized approaches are necessary for effective ecosystem recovery. Computer modeling and field data show that optimal restoration strategies depend on specific local soil and climate conditions, and achieving multiple goals such as carbon storage, water retention, and nutrient cycling often requires trade-offs.

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.