Unlocking the drivers of voluntary single-use plastic reduction

Lisa Lock
scientific editor

Alexander Pol
deputy editor

A belief that individual actions do make a meaningful difference is among the common factors that motivate people to voluntarily reduce their consumption of single-use plastics (SUP), a Griffith University study has discovered.
The study found individuals who strongly identified with environmental protection, received positive social reinforcement, set clear goals, and believed their actions would make a meaningful difference, were significantly more likely to engage in SUP reduction behaviors.
Excessive use of SUP tableware, including items such as plastic takeaway containers, cutlery and straws, continues to contribute to the global waste crisis.
The study aimed to discover the potential barriers and enablers of SUP tableware reduction behavior.
Co-author of the study and Social Marketing at Griffith Director Professor Sharyn Rundle Thiele said while governments around the world were focused on bans and levies, voluntary behavior change remained an untapped solution to addressing SUP consumption.
"People are increasingly willing to engage in pro-environmental purchase and consumption behavior, but there is a big gap between what people intend to do and what they actually do," Professor Rundle-Thiele said.
"Our research highlighted that motivation alone does not lead to behavior change. Individuals must also have the knowledge, skills and opportunity to act on their intentions.
"Some examples of capability include knowledge of alternatives, the ability to plan ahead, and the development of sustainable habits.
"Opportunity refers to the presence of alternatives and supportive social norms, which include encouragement from social networks and being a part of environments that enable and reinforce sustainable practices."
The study applied the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation—Behavior) behavioral model to examine the full spectrum of barriers and enablers that affected an individual's ability and motivation to reduce SUP consumption.
The COM-B model accounted for 70% of the motivational factors associated with SUP tableware reduction.
The study showed successful SUP reduction interventions needed to go beyond traditional education and policy approaches to incorporate capability and opportunity.
"This research provides a valuable framework for developing targeted interventions that bridge the gap between environmental attitudes and actual behavior," Professor Rundle-Thiele said.
"By incorporating behavioral insights and addressing the psychological and environmental conditions that shape consumer behavior, policymakers, social marketers, and environmental advocates can more effectively promote sustainable practices."
Published in the Sustainable Futures journal, the "Driving voluntary reduction of single-use plastic consumption: Capability, opportunity, and motivation" was a collaboration between The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, University of Reading, Technical University of Berlin and Griffith University.
The study is among the first to offer a nuanced understanding of human behavior in environmental contexts.
More information: Daisy Lee et al, Driving voluntary reduction of single-use plastic consumption: Capability, opportunity, and motivation, Sustainable Futures (2025).
Provided by Griffith University