The remnant of a high-mass star supernova explosion imaged by the Chandra X-ray Observatory, left, and the remnant of a low-mass star evaporating in a blue bubble, right. Credit:

For decades, astronomers have wondered what the very first stars in the universe were like. These stars formed new chemical elements, which enriched the universe and allowed the next generations of stars to form the first planets.

were initially composed of pure hydrogen and helium, and they were massive—hundreds to thousands of times the and millions of times more luminous. Their short lives ended in , so they had neither the time nor raw materials to form planets, and they should no longer exist for astronomers to observe.

At least that's what we thought.

Two studies published in the first half of 2025 suggest that collapsing in the may have formed lower-mass stars as well. uses a new astrophysical computer simulation that models turbulence within the cloud, causing fragmentation into smaller, star-forming clumps. The —an independent laboratory experiment—demonstrates how molecular hydrogen, a molecule essential for , may have formed earlier and in larger abundances. The process involves a catalyst that may surprise chemistry teachers.

who studies star and planet formation and their dependence on chemical processes, I am excited at the possibility that chemistry in the first 50 million to 100 million years after the Big Bang may have been more active than we expected.

These findings suggest that the second generation of stars—the oldest stars we can currently observe and possibly the hosts of the first planets—may have formed earlier than astronomers thought.

Primordial star formation

when massive clouds of hydrogen many light years across collapse under their own gravity. The collapse continues until a luminous sphere surrounds a dense core that is hot enough to sustain .

happens when two or more atoms gain enough energy to fuse together. This process creates a new element and releases an incredible amount of energy, which heats the stellar core. In the , fused together to create helium.

The new star shines because its surface is hot, but the energy fueling that luminosity percolates up from its core. is its total energy output in the form of light. The star's brightness is the small fraction of that luminosity that we directly observe.

This process where stars form heavier elements by nuclear fusion is called . It continues in stars after they form . The more massive stars can produce heavier elements such as carbon, oxygen and nitrogen, all the way up to iron, in a sequence of fusion reactions that end in a .

Supernovae can create even heavier elements, completing the . Lower-mass stars like the sun, with their cooler cores, can sustain fusion only up to carbon. As they exhaust the hydrogen and helium in their cores, nuclear fusion stops and the stars slowly evaporate.

High-mass stars have high pressure and temperature in their cores, so they . They last only a few million years, whereas —those less than two times the sun's mass—evolve much more slowly, with lifetimes of billions or even trillions of years.

If the earliest stars were all high-mass stars, then they would have exploded long ago. But if low-mass stars also formed in the early universe, they may still .

Video illustration of the star and planet formation process. Credit: Space Telescope Science Institute

Chemistry that cools clouds

The first star-forming gas clouds, called protostellar clouds, were warm—. Warm gas has internal pressure that pushes outward against the inward force of gravity trying to collapse the cloud. A stays inflated by the same principle. If the flame heating the air at the base of the balloon stops, the air inside cools and the balloon begins to collapse.

Only the most massive protostellar clouds with the most gravity could overcome the thermal pressure and eventually collapse. In this scenario, the first stars were all massive.

The only way to form the lower-mass stars we see today is for the protostellar clouds to cool. Gas in space , which transforms thermal energy into light that carries the energy out of the cloud. Hydrogen and helium atoms are not efficient radiators below several thousand degrees, but , H₂, is great at cooling gas at low temperatures.

When energized, H₂ emits infrared light, which cools the gas and lowers the internal pressure. That process would make gravitational collapse more likely in lower-mass clouds.

For decades, astronomers have reasoned that a low abundance of H₂ early on resulted in hotter clouds whose internal pressure would be too hot to easily collapse into stars. They concluded that only clouds with enormous masses, and therefore higher gravity, would collapse—leaving more massive stars.

Helium hydride

In a , physicist Florian Grussie and collaborators at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear 鶹Ժics demonstrated that the first molecule to form in the universe, , HeH⁺, could have been more abundant in the early universe than previously thought. They used a computer model and conducted a laboratory experiment to verify this result.

Helium hydride? In high school science you probably learned that helium is a , meaning it does not react with other atoms to form molecules or chemical compounds. As it turns out, it does—but only under the extremely sparse and dark , before the first stars formed.

HeH⁺ reacts with hydrogen deuteride—HD, which is one normal hydrogen atom bonded to a —to form H₂. In the process, HeH⁺ also acts as a coolant and releases heat in the form of light. So, the high abundance of both molecular coolants earlier on may have allowed smaller clouds to cool faster and collapse to form lower-mass stars.

Gas flow also affects stellar initial masses

In another study, 2025, astrophysicist Ke-Jung Chen led a research group at the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics using a detailed computer simulation that modeled how gas in the early universe may have flowed.

The team's model demonstrated that , in giant collapsing gas clouds can form lower-mass cloud fragments from which lower-mass stars condense.

The study concluded that turbulence may have allowed these early gas clouds to form stars either the same size or up to 40 times more massive than the sun's mass.

The two new studies both predict that the first population of stars could have included low-mass stars. Now, it is up to us observational astronomers to .

. Low-mass stars have low luminosities, so they are extremely faint. Several have recently reported , but none are yet confirmed with high confidence. If they are out there, though, we will find them eventually.

More information: F. Grussie et al, Experimental confirmation of barrierless reactions between HeH+ and deuterium atoms suggests a lower abundance of the first molecules at very high redshifts, Astronomy & Astrophysics (2025).

Ke-Jung Chen et al, Formation of Supersonic Turbulence in the Primordial Star-forming Cloud, The Astrophysical Journal Letters (2025).

Journal information: Astrophysical Journal Letters , Astronomy & Astrophysics

Provided by The Conversation