Meat is macho: Why masculinity concepts get in the way of green initiatives to cut meat and dairy consumption

Gaby Clark
scientific editor

Andrew Zinin
lead editor

A new study shows that traditional masculine norms are a significant barrier preventing men from reducing their meat and dairy consumption, and recommends how to better appeal to men to change their dietary ways to mitigate damage to the environment from animal agriculture.
Researchers from the University of Bath, Bryant Research and the University of Zurich examined the relationship between eating meat and animal products. They looked into ways to reduce meat consumption and improve plant-based marketing in the study: "Macho meals? A mixed methods study on traditional masculine norms and animal product consumption in the UK" published in the .
"Animal agriculture is key culprit of environmental degradation, public health risks, and animal suffering. Reducing meat and animal product consumption is widely recognized as an effective way to mitigate these harms. However, men continue to consume more meat than women, are less likely to be vegetarian or vegan, and are more resistant to initiatives that promote reductions in meat consumption," said Dr. Annayah Prosser of the University of Bath School of Management.
The survey of over 1,000 men in the UK showed that those who more strongly embraced traditional masculine norms such as self-reliance and not sharing or showing emotions ate significantly more red meat and poultry. They also reported a deeper emotional attachment to meat and dairy, and were more likely to view meat‐eating as masculine, as well as regarding vegetarianism as a cultural threat.
The researchers assessed whether traditional masculinity predicts how often men consume meat, their emotional attachment to it, and the perceived masculinity of meat. They then explored and factored in six aspects of traditional masculinity—avoidance of femininity, restrictive emotionality, aggression, achievement status, self‐reliance, and attitudes toward sex.
"Beyond the well‐known link between masculinity and meat, our study identified two masculine norms that may drive this connection: 'avoidance of femininity' and 'achievement status."
"Men endorsing these specific norms tended to eat more meat, were more attached to meat and dairy, viewed vegetarianism as a threat to British culture and found meat more masculine. To shift men's diets, the challenge is to address these norms and find ways to work with—not against—men's identities," said lead author Elise Hankins of Bryant Research.
Follow-up remotely-moderated focus groups explored further how men speak about meat consumption, gender and diet within their peer groups. While the links between meat and masculinity were clear in the survey, men in the focus groups often spoke about meat consumption and gender in contradictory ways:
Dr. Prosser explains, "Men in our focus groups were conflicted over the role masculinity played in their meat consumption. At first, many men wholly dismissed the role their gender had over their diet, but minutes later they would speak about the vast influences their social network and male peer group had on their menu choices.
"Researchers understand that eating is a fundamentally social activity, and our research shows that while men may not wish to recognize it overtly, masculinity has a major covert influence on dietary choices."
Armed with the study outcomes, the researchers proposed the following strategies to make plant-based eating more appealing to men:
- Prioritize taste—Since skepticism about flavor remains a major barrier amongst men, campaigns should offer taste tests, highlight flavor in advertising, and invest in making plant-based products more appealing.
- Focus on health and nutrition—education on the health benefits of plant-based diets -especially around protein, fitness, and longevity—can help counter myths and align with self-oriented male motivations.
- Use implicit messaging—instead of overtly marketing plant-based foods as "manly," link them subtly to values like performance, strength, and adventure to avoid alienating men who reject gendered food narratives.
- Balance clarity and appeal in labeling—continue using familiar "meaty" labels for plant-based alternatives to meet taste expectations, while educating consumers that these products are designed as recognizable replacements—not deceptive substitutes.
- Leverage social influence—since partners, friends, and family shape men's food choices, interventions could tap into these networks to encourage plant-based eating.
- Address cost concerns—Policies to make plant-based products more affordable—through subsidies or price incentives—could help level the playing field with conventional meat and dairy.
The research team comprised Elise Hankins, Abby Couture, Charlotte Flores of Bryant Research; Nicholas Poh-Jie Tan of the University of Zurich; and Dr. Annayah Prosser of the University of Bath.
More information: Elise Hankins et al, Macho meals? A mixed methods study on traditional masculine norms and animal product consumption in the UK, Journal of Environmental Psychology (2025).
Provided by University of Bath