Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


The Pacific's united front on climate action is splintering over deep-sea mining

The Pacific’s united front on climate action is splintering over deep-sea mining
Nautilus Mineral’s Solwara-1 deep-sea mining project in Papua New Guinea wound up in 2019. Pictured: the company’s three seabed mining vehicles. Credit: Nautilus Minerals

In recent years, Pacific island nations have as champions of climate action. Pacific leaders view sea level rise as an existential threat.

But this united front is now under strain as some Pacific nations pursue a controversial new industry—deep-sea mining. Nauru, the Cook Islands, Kiribati and Tonga have gone the furthest to make it a reality, attracted by new income streams. But nations such as Fiji, Palau and Vanuatu have called for a moratorium on deep-sea mining in international waters.

Public opinion across the Pacific is often divided, pitting possible economic gains against the potential risks of an industry whose remain but . As this tension intensifies, it may split the Pacific and risk the region's moral authority on climate.

What are the concerns over deep-sea mining?

Deep-sea mining targets of mineral deposits—polymetallic nodules strewn across deep underwater plains, cobalt-rich crusts on seamounts, and the around hydrothermal vents.

To extract them, mining companies can use to pump ore to the surface and return the wastewater. This creates plumes of sediment which marine life. Methods of minimizing damage to species from mining on land are at depth.

Deep-sea ecosystems are poorly understood, but we know they are slow to recover. Researchers areas mined as a test more than 40 years ago still show physical damage and immobile corals and sponges remain scarce.

Why is there so much interest in deep-sea mining?

Deep-sea mining hasn't begun anywhere in earnest, because the International Seabed Authority has rules governing extraction. This authority of the world's oceans beyond territorial waters.

But plans for deep-sea mining operations can still be submitted and considered .

Analysts have estimated seabed minerals could be worth a staggering . Some of the richest deposits lie in the in international waters between Hawaii and Mexico, thousands of kilometers away from Pacific nations. Under , companies cannot mine in international waters on their own. They need to be officially sponsored by a national government, which has to keep over its operations.

One reason deep-sea mining companies see Pacific states as such useful partners is that these countries can access of international seabed set aside for developing countries, as well as potential resources in the very large territorial waters around many island states.

Backers in , , the and argue rising demand for manganese, cobalt, copper and nickel could deliver significant economic returns and diversify economies.

Nauru

Nauru's enormous deposits of guano—compressed seabird excrement long sought as fertilizer— the country wealthy. But the guano is largely gone and the small nation has limited other resources.

Nauru sponsors , a wholly owned subsidiary of seabed mining company . In , the company received an International Seabed Authority contract permitting exploration of polymetallic nodules in the , more than 8,000km from Nauru.

Nauru has since "" in developing international legal frameworks in mining nodules in the international seabed.

In June, Nauru Nauru Ocean Resources would apply for an .

Tonga

Tonga's government is similarly backing deep-sea mining by partnering with The Metals Company to explore mining in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone.

In August 2025, Tonga signed an with Tonga Offshore Mining, a subsidiary of The Metals Company. The agreement was originally signed in 2021 amid large-scale criticism over the .

The mining company has promised , ranging from financial benefits, scholarships and community programs. Even so, the revised deal has from civil society, young people and legal experts. Prominent Tongans , citing environmental, legal and transparency risks.

Economic pressure is part of the picture. Tonga an estimated A$180 million to China's Exim Bank—roughly a quarter of its annual GDP.

Cook Islands

The 15 Cook Islands are widely scattered, giving the government exclusive rights to almost two million square kilometers of ocean. The government has issued inside its Exclusive Economic Zone to three companies—, , and . The Cook Islands government has established a and is building .

Kiribati

Kiribati's atolls and island are even more dispersed. The nation's exclusive economic zone covers about 3.4 million km². The state-owned Marawa Research and Exploration company holds a 15-year with the seabed authority. Kiribati has to explore potential collaboration.

The Pacific split

While revenues could potentially be sizeable for the Pacific, costs, technologies and environmental liabilities are .

The experience of Papua New Guinea is a cautionary tale. In 2019, the PNG deep-sea mining venture Solwara-1 following . The fallout cost the government an estimated . The PNG government deep-sea mining in its territorial waters.

While deep-sea mining now has clear backers, other nations are far more wary.

In 2022, launched calling for a moratorium on mining in . Early signatories included , and the . Since then, Tuvalu, Vanuatu and the Marshall Islands have joined, as well as dozens of other countries. PNG has not yet joined.

Opposition from these Pacific states is based on the , which favors caution when knowledge is limited and damage is possible.

Pacific youth are among the most prominent opponents of deep-sea mining. The regional coalition uniting civil society, faith groups, women's organizations and youth networks has consistently called for a in the region. Young people have spoke out publicly in nations such as Tonga, where youth advocates criticized limited consultation and , as well as the , where young people have demanded transparency.

Reputation under a cloud?

Pacific leaders have built a worldwide reputation for their principled climate diplomacy, from to the major new on climate change issued by the world's top court in response to a case students from the University of the South Pacific.

If some Pacific leaders open the door fully to , it risks undermining the region's united front on environmental issues and threatens its credibility.

The way this plays out will shape how the world hears the Pacific on climate and the oceans in the years ahead.

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .The Conversation

Citation: The Pacific's united front on climate action is splintering over deep-sea mining (2025, September 1) retrieved 29 September 2025 from /news/2025-09-pacific-front-climate-action-splintering.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

'Sound science' must guide deep-sea mining: top official

0 shares

Feedback to editors