麻豆淫院

Why move to a city? And why leave? Urban centers today see populations ebb and flow for a multitude of reasons鈥攖he economy, crowds, lifestyle considerations, air quality, the odd pandemic perhaps. As it turns out, it's sort of always been that way.

The earliest cities worldwide were born of country folk: farmers; agriculturists. They were agrarian populations, reliant on land-extensive economies, which incentivized them to live dispersed across the landscape in small settlements, to minimize the time and travel costs between their residences and farm plots.

Then as now, though, city living was more expensive in all ways: greater susceptibility to crowd diseases, greater competition for land and resources and rising levels of systemic inequality. Still, farmers chose to bear these seemingly paradoxical costs. Why?

That question has been the source of a long-standing debate, according to UC Santa Barbara archaeologist Douglas Kennett, who has conducted extensive research into urbanization in Classic Maya cities. The answer, he said, is complicated, suggesting there are multiple, often overlapping factors for both the rise and the fall of these ancient urban centers.

Kennett and collaborators from several institutions explore and elucidate that complexity in in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The research leverages population ecology theory and quantifies the drivers of urbanism across the Classic Maya Lowlands.

"We determined that the rise and expansion of Classic Maya cities resulted from the interaction of climate downturns, intergroup conflict and the presence of strong economies of scale realized through capital investments in agricultural infrastructure," Kennett said. "These factors promoted the coevolution of urbanism, systemic inequality and patron-client relationships in cities."

Using that same framework, he added, the researchers also determined that deurbanization set in "when the benefits of urban living no longer outweighed the costs, as environments were degraded near cities and climate amelioration improved the livability of rural areas where people would have more freedom and autonomy."

Indeed, the team's initial interest was centered on the role of climate change鈥攕pecifically drought鈥攊n the decline of Classic Maya cities. Since 2012, the group has been amassing archaeological data on changing population sizes, conflict and investments in agricultural infrastructure. Then they came into some newly available high-resolution climate data.

"We also capitalized on major developments in computational modeling that allowed us to look at the relationships between these datasets in ways not previously possible," Kennett said.

Their results integrate previously contentious and separate theories of urbanization鈥攕uch as environmental stress, warfare and economic factors鈥攊nto a single, dynamic model based on concepts from population ecology. The study also resolves the paradox of why agrarian populations鈥攚hose land-extensive economy incentivizes dispersal鈥攚ould aggregate despite the high costs of urbanization.

"The biggest surprise for me was that the abandonment of cities occurred under improving climatic conditions," Kennett noted. "We have long thought that the decline of Classic Maya cities partially resulted from an extended period of drought. It turns out to be a much more complicated and interesting story."

All told, the new work offers critical insights for understanding and managing contemporary and future urban evolution by establishing timeless, universal principles for how populations aggregate and disperse.