Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

September 22, 2015

Are we wiser about tsunamis? Expert says yes and no

Tsunami expert Emile Okal surveys the devastation of the Pacific island Niuatoputapu, Tonga, following the 2009 Samoa tsunami. The site was a palm grove where all the trees, towering more than 50 feet high, were felled by the wave. In a recent study, Okal found mixed results as to how much wiser people have become about these natural events. Credit: Emile A. Okal, Northwestern University
× close
Tsunami expert Emile Okal surveys the devastation of the Pacific island Niuatoputapu, Tonga, following the 2009 Samoa tsunami. The site was a palm grove where all the trees, towering more than 50 feet high, were felled by the wave. In a recent study, Okal found mixed results as to how much wiser people have become about these natural events. Credit: Emile A. Okal, Northwestern University

The world may not be well prepared for the next significant tsunami, reports Northwestern University tsunami expert Emile A. Okal in a new study that includes a "wisdom index" for 17 tsunamis since 2004.

The 2004 Sumatra-Andaman tsunami was the most devastating in recorded history, killing more than 225,000 people, including thousands of tourists. In his review of that event and 16 other significant tsunamis since then, Okal used the concept of a "wisdom index" to grade the performance of scientists, decision-makers and populations at risk. The index was based on the warning issued (or not) during the event and on the response of the population.

Okal found mixed results as to how much wiser people have become about these natural events and how to reduce their impact.

"We cannot foresee how well we will be doing in the next tsunami," said Okal, a seismologist and professor of Earth and planetary sciences in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences. "I found that mitigation of these 17 tsunamis was rather erratic—there is not sustained improvement with time, nor a clear correlation of the wisdom index with the geographic location of the tsunami source."

In his paper, Okal reflects on the progress made since the catastrophic event of 2004 in various aspects of tsunami science, warning and mitigation and more generally in tsunami resilience, i.e., the preventive adaptation of communities to this form of natural hazard.

"" was published Sept. 21 by the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters — to customize your preferences!

In addition to the mixed "wisdom indices," the key results of Okal's study are:

Okal stresses the importance of incorporating any new knowledge into tsunami warning procedures and public awareness.

"In this day and age of professional and leisure travel, the general public worldwide should be aware of risk," Okal said. "The 2004 Sumatra event was the most lethal disaster in the history of Sweden. The country lost about 500 tourists on the beaches of Thailand."

Okal said his research was strongly influenced by his 20-year collaboration with Costas Synolakis, director of the Tsunami Research Center at the University of Southern California.

In a separate article in the same issue of the journal, Synolakis critically assesses the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident in Japan and concludes it was due to the cumulation of a number of scientific, engineering and management blunders that could and should have been prevented.

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.