Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

March 8, 2019

Blame wood-burning stoves for winter air pollution and health threats

Credit: AI-generated image ()
× close
Credit: AI-generated image ()

It may be natural, but there's nothing safe or environmentally sound about heating your home with wood.

The World Health Organization has ranked . One in nine deaths are due to .

In Canada, . My own research shows that in rural British Columbia the main source of winter air pollution is residential wood burning, and that it is mostly being ignored and rarely monitored by government.

Health hazard

Wood smoke may smell good, but it is not good for you.

The main threat comes from the cocktail of tiny particles and droplets that are about 2.5 microns in diameter (also called PM2.5). Due to their size, they easily work their way into our lungs, bloodstream, brain and other organs, triggering , , .

Chronic exposure to PM2.5 is linked to , , , and .

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters — to customize your preferences!

Wood smoke affects everyone, but children are especially vulnerable in part because their respiratory systems are under development. Pregnant women exposed to may have children with , decreased thyroid function and . Children who are are more likely to have a wood stove in the house, although other factors may also play a role.

The elderly are also at risk. A recent study of people living in B.C., in Kamloops, Prince George, Courtenay and the Comox Valley, showed that wood stove pollution .

And that nice smell? It comes from benzene, a , and acrolein.

With the dozens of , it's inconsistent for governments to ban smoking and vaping in public places while ignoring the smoke from wood stoves and fireplaces.

Pollution from wood fires can become trapped in a valley when warm air holds cold air close to the ground. Credit: S/V Moonrise/Wikimedia,
× close
Pollution from wood fires can become trapped in a valley when warm air holds cold air close to the ground. Credit: S/V Moonrise/Wikimedia,

Neither sustainable nor carbon neutral

Burning wood for energy and it is . It also releases black carbon, a powerful short-lived pollutant, that can .

There are alternatives. For everyday heating, mini-split air source . They are often three to four times more efficient than electric baseboard heaters and can work in colder climates. For example, the community of Skidegate in Haida Gwaii .

Efficient propane stoves and heaters are an excellent complement to heat pumps and can provide top-up heating on very cold days as well as backup heating during power outages.

Most regional and municipal governments in B.C. have been reluctant to deal with these issues, and tend to focus on wood stove exchange programs as the solution. Based on my current research, the vocal response by the wood-burning industry and its customers often drowns out reasoned discussion.

The B.C. Lung Association has also been a strong advocate of wood stove exchange programs. But even the cleanest, highest level of eco-certified wood stoves —and the wood stove may be right beside you.

Citizen science is a gamechanger

Concerned citizens have set-up an . Kamloops, for example, with a topography that tends to trap air pollution from heavy industry and residential wood burning, has 30 of these wifi-enabled, real-time sensors, as do hundreds of other communities around the world.

These monitors show a distinct and troublesome pattern. The clear "signature" of wood burning shows that many rural B.C. communities often have winter air pollution levels that far exceed those seen in larger cities like Victoria and Vancouver. Some of the sensors . Wood smoke is creating hot spots that expose people to levels of air pollution not normally recorded by provincial air quality monitors.

Wood smoke, and the cultural and social practices that allow it to be generated without much regulation and control, operates in a vacuum where preconceptions, origin stories and strong emotions impair action. We need another narrative.

Lack of government action to deal with this problem encourages people to ignore this evidence and to underestimate the risk. Burning deprives people of the right to breathe clean air in their own homes, and it ultimately represents an uncontrolled form of secondhand smoke exposure with broad implications.

Provided by The Conversation

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.