Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


Four ways rich nations can keep promises to curb emissions and fund climate adaptation

climate change cost
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

The time has come for Canada and other rich nations to pony-up and pay for . That means, for a start, providing far greater climate adaptation financing to low-income countries and plugging the holes that siphon their limited fiscal resources to tax havens.

Two Canadians have prominent roles at the . United Nations Ambassador Bob Rae, is co-chair of the COP26 finance panel, and Mark Carney is the UN special envoy for COP26, responsible for getting financial institutions to join the new . They are experienced and highly respected individuals with solid reputations as mediators.

However, despite Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's recent climate plan, . Furthermore, will not be viewed favorably as Ambassador Rae attempts to negotiate a meaningful international climate agreement.

The . The "Big Six" Canadian banks—BMO, CIBC, National Bank, RBC, Scotiabank and TD—signed on days before the summit was to begin. Their pledge will undoubtedly be met with allegations that this was merely a public relations exercise. Since the Paris deal was signed in 2015, .

Canada, one of the worst carbon emitters

Canada is, historically, the 10th largest carbon emitter and the on a per capita basis. The has committed to reducing carbon emissions to 45 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. However, it has not committed to end fossil fuel company subsidies or provide an end-date for fossil fuel production, despite the .

Low-income countries are tiny emitters of greenhouse gases, least responsible for climate change, yet bearing its worst consequences. In the past 15 years, 90 percent of deaths from have occurred in low- and . The UN refugee agency estimates that every year. For these countries, adaptation, not mitigation, is the overriding priority.

Create zero-interest loans

Twelve years ago, at the Copenhagen summit, promised to provide developing countries US$100 billion a year in climate finance by 2020. .

Canada has contributed less . Even with the Trudeau government's promise to double climate financing to US$4.2 billion over five years, US$840 million per year, this is still only 24 percent of its fair share. The , of which I am a member of the executive, has called for a quadrupling of Canada's financing commitment as a bare minimum.

Moreover of rich country financing is in the form of loans, increasing the stress on countries already struggling to manage their debt burdens.

International Monetary Fund-created money, or , which is allocated to countries based on their economic size, is largely unused by rich countries. Although discussions are ongoing, there has been no commitment to recycle these funds into zero-interest loans to low-income countries.

Tax havens harm climate action

Tax havens have disproportionately siphoned off wealth from , a that prompted the exit of colonial wealth via the proliferation of tax havens. Their losses have been accentuated during the pandemic.

According to a these countries are losing the equivalent to more than half of their yearly public health budgets due to the shifting of . The loss is equivalent to eight percent of rich countries' health budgets.

More than 130 countries, including Canada, have reached an agreement, co-ordinated by the OECD, that would establish a . However, it has been sharply criticized as being rife with loopholes and carveouts. Oxfam accused it of pandering to corporations, having "practically no teeth" and offering no revenue for the world's poorest countries.

Tax havens are enabled by an infrastructure of lawyers, accountants and bankers, including some from Canada. Rich countries' efforts to restrict and bring greater transparency to international tax rules have largely fallen short.

Even by that standard Canada has been a laggard. The Liberal government recently and promised in its most recent budget to address cross-border tax avoidance and evasion schemes. How effective these will be in reining in these actions by wealthy individuals and corporations; past inaction does not bode well going forward. Carney will have his work cut out for him if, or when, he addresses these issues at COP26.

No more blah, blah, blah

To its credit, Canada, along with several other developed countries, is a member of the , a group at the UN talks comprising many of the poorest and most vulnerable developing countries. But good intentions and empty promises will not pass muster. We don't need more "blah blah blah," to quote Greta Thunberg.

The UN Human Rights Council recently and established a . These developments have the potential to make major emitting companies, including Canada's, legally liable for human rights violations arising from climate change.

Hopefully, this will put additional pressure on rich countries to get serious about financing, debt restructuring and development funding for poor nations. Inaction is a luxury we can no longer afford.

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .The Conversation

Citation: Four ways rich nations can keep promises to curb emissions and fund climate adaptation (2021, October 25) retrieved 22 June 2025 from /news/2021-10-ways-rich-nations-curb-emissions.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Rich countries fall $10 billion short in climate finance pledges

4 shares

Feedback to editors