Â鶹ÒùÔº

Forests are critically important for slowing climate change. They remove huge quantities of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere——and store carbon in trees and soils. Old and mature forests are especially important: They handle droughts, storms and wildfires better than young trees, and they store more carbon.

In a 2022 executive order, President Joe Biden called for on federal lands. Recently Biden protected nearly half of the Tongass National Forest in Alaska from road-building and logging.

The Biden administration is compiling an inventory of mature and old-growth forests on public lands that will support further conservation actions. But at the same time, federal agencies are initiating and implementing numerous in mature and old forests without accounting for how these projects will affect climate change or forest species.

As scientists who have spent decades studying and , we find that to effectively slow climate change, it is essential to increase carbon storage in these forests, not reduce it. A first step toward this goal would be to halt logging federal forests with relatively until the Biden administration develops a plan for conserving them.

Balancing timber and climate change

Many of the that the federal government owns and manages are used for multiple purposes, including protecting biodiversity and water quality, recreation, mining, grazing and logging. Sometimes these uses conflict with one another.

Legal mandates to manage land for multiple uses do not explicitly mention climate change, and federal agencies into their plans. However, at the beginning of 2023, the White House directed federal agencies to consider the effects of climate change when they that significantly affect the environment.

Some logging projects fall into this category. But many large logging projects that affect thousands of acres have been from such analysis.

What's lost when old trees are cut

Most forests in the continental U.S. have been harvested multiple times. Today, fewer than 5% of these forests . Old, very large trees are the ones that hold the most carbon, and harvesting forests is the main driver of forest carbon loss.

For example, in Oregon's national forests east of the Cascades crest, a 1990s policy formerly spared trees larger than 21 inches in diameter—but the rule was rolled back in 2021 so that large trees could be cut. A recent analysis found that these larger trees comprised just 3% of all trees in the six national forests, but .

In the Green Mountain National Forest in Vermont, federal officials have approved 40,000 acres of harvest since 2016, targeting many mature and old trees. One 14,270-acre area that was approved for harvest in 2019 contained . This project required the construction of 25 miles of logging roads, which , including fragmenting forests, polluting streams and making forests more vulnerable to human-caused wildfires.

Canada is also allowing large, mature trees to be harvested. In British Columbia, mature forests that include old-growth trees historically absorbed more carbon than they released to the atmosphere, resulting in a net carbon sink annually. But since 2002, these tracts have emitted more carbon than they removed from the atmosphere, primarily because of logging, beetle attacks and wildfires. According to British Columbia's greenhouse gas emissions inventory, these forests now .

In eastern Canada, the Pacific Northwest and the southeastern U.S., timber companies have removed many old trees and replaced them with plantations that contain just one or two tree species. This shift has reduced the structural diversity of the —the ecologically important layer formed by the crowns of trees—and the diversity of tree species. Losing old-forest habitat has also caused broad-scale among many forest bird species in eastern Canada, and is likely having the same effect in the U.S.

More harvesting releases more carbon

One argument forest product companies make to support logging is that wood can be regrown, and it than other building materials. Such claims often make optimistic assumptions that overstate the carbon benefits of harvesting trees by .

Some studies indicate that by harvesting some trees and can reduce the intensity of future wildfires, leaving more carbon stored in trees. But these studies don't account for the that is released to the atmosphere after trees are cut.

In a review published in 2019, we worked with colleagues to estimate how much carbon was contained in trees that were harvested in Washington, Oregon and California from 1900 through 2015, and what happened to it after the trees were logged. We calculated that just 19% of the harvested carbon was in long-lived wood products like timber in buildings. Another 16% was in landfills, and the remaining 65% was as carbon dioxide.

In contrast, in 2011 the Australian state of Tasmania . Within less than a decade, Tasmania was because it was avoiding harvest emissions and the mature trees it saved were accumulating so much carbon.

In the U.S. Pacific Northwest, implementation of the 1994 , which the Clinton administration developed to protect endangered species in old-growth forests on public lands, significantly over the next 17 years. In contrast, privately managed lands in the region accumulated virtually no additional carbon after accounting for losses from wildfire and harvesting.

The cheapest and simplest way to capture carbon

President Biden has set a goal of reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions to to avoid catastrophic climate change. To reach that goal, U.S. forests, lands and oceans will have to remove as much carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as the nation emits from fossil fuels, industry and agriculture.

In the western U.S., our research shows that protecting half of the mature carbon-dense forests in zones that are relatively less vulnerable to drought and fire could on protected forests by 2050. A majority of these forests are on public lands.

The carbon dioxide that human activities are releasing into the atmosphere today will elevate global temperatures and raise sea levels , unless societies can find ways to remove it. In its 2022 climate assessment report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded that protecting existing natural forests was "."

Conserving forests is one of the lowest-cost options for managing carbon dioxide emissions, and it doesn't require expensive or complex energy-consuming technologies. In our view, sufficient science exists to justify a moratorium on harvesting mature trees on federal lands so that these forests can keep performing their invaluable work.

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .