Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

March 17, 2025

Innovative boot sock sampling reveals E. coli levels in surface soils of informal settlements

Research Field Team Lead Meiva Setoka conducts surface-soil sampling with bootsocks in a settlement in Suva, Fiji. Credit: Monash University
× close
Research Field Team Lead Meiva Setoka conducts surface-soil sampling with bootsocks in a settlement in Suva, Fiji. Credit: Monash University

Researchers in Fiji's informal settlements are using their own footsteps to detect the hidden pathogens in soil that traditional techniques often miss.

Soil contamination is a major health risk in , where untreated wastewater and fecal matter can seep into the surrounding environment, increasing the risk of exposure to fecal pathogens among under-served populations.

To tackle this issue, researchers introduced a new approach—boot sock sampling—detailed in their newly published in Science Advances.

The boot socks collect dirt from outdoor areas, creating a sample that paints a more comprehensive picture of pathogen levels in soil environments. It's a clever twist on traditional gold standard methods, such as grab sampling, which gives a limited snapshot of soil quality.

Lead author Dr. Lamiya Bata, a former Ph.D. candidate at the Monash-led RISE program, and based at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, said boot sock sampling was a composite method, with each step collecting a "mini set of samples," and covers a larger surface area to reveal pathogens in .

Field sampling for the collection of boot sock and grab samples. In the field, a sampler (A) prepares to collect a boot sock sample, wearing overshoes (B) and boot socks (C). The sampler (D) collects a grab sample using a disposable plastic bag and a wooden Popsicle stick (E). Credit: Science Advances (2025). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adq9869
× close
Field sampling for the collection of boot sock and grab samples. In the field, a sampler (A) prepares to collect a boot sock sample, wearing overshoes (B) and boot socks (C). The sampler (D) collects a grab sample using a disposable plastic bag and a wooden Popsicle stick (E). Credit: Science Advances (2025). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adq9869

"Think of it as giving your shoes a secret mission while you go about your day. The socks collect dirt from high-traffic outdoor areas, like playgrounds and walkways," Lamiya said.

"The boot sock method provides a far more sensitive detection of E. coli, showing less variation between samples. This makes it a more efficient tool for assessing and allows for more accurate, broad-scale assessments in real-world settings."

The research also found that fewer samples were needed to cover larger areas, improving both time and compared to traditional methods.

This breakthrough opens up the possibility of applying the boot sock technique to study other pathogens and environments beyond informal settlements, offering valuable insights for public health risk assessments.

"We're excited by the potential of this technique to be adapted for use in diverse settings, including indoor environments, and to guide interventions, especially in high-risk areas where people may have limited sanitation infrastructure," Lamiya said.

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters — to customize your preferences!

More information: Lamiya Bata et al, Assessing E. coli levels in surface soils of informal settlements using boot sock and standard grab methods, Science Advances (2025).

Journal information: Science Advances

Provided by Monash University

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

Boot sock sampling effectively detects E. coli in surface soils of informal settlements, surpassing traditional methods like grab sampling. This technique collects soil samples through footsteps, offering a comprehensive view of pathogen levels and improving detection sensitivity. It requires fewer samples, enhancing time and cost efficiency. The method holds potential for broader applications in various environments and public health assessments.

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.