Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


Trump is stripping protections from marine protected areas. Why that's a problem for fishing's future

fish
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

The to the diversity of life in our oceans over the past 50 years, more than , has been unsustainable fishing practices.

In much of the ocean, there is of commercial fishing or other human activities. That's part of the reason of marine plant and animal species are considered threatened or at risk.

It's also why countries around the world have been creating marine protected areas.

These protected areas, covering (30 million square kilometers) in 16,000 locations, offer refuge away from human activities for a wide variety of living creatures, from corals to and whales. They give a place to thrive, and those fish , which helps fishing industries and local economies.

In the U.S., however, marine protection is by .

Trump issued a proclamation on April 17, 2025, titled "," ordering the removal of key protections to allow commercial fishing in parts of a marine protected area called the .

He also of all other marine national monuments to decide if they should be opened to commercial fishing too. In addition, the Trump administration is under the in a way that would allow for more .

I'm a and , and it's no accident that all my favorite dive sites are within marine protected areas. I've found what from across the world show: Protected areas have much healthier marine life populations and healthier ecosystems.

What's at risk in the Pacific

The Pacific Island Heritage National Marine Monument, about 750 miles west of Hawaii, is dotted by coral reefs and atolls, with species of fish, marine mammals and birds rarely found anywhere else.

It is home to protected and endangered species, including turtles, whales and Hawaiian monk seals. Palmyra Atoll and Kingman Reef, both within the area, are considered in the world, each providing habitats for a wide range of fish and other species.

These marine species are able to thrive there and because their habitats have been protected.

President George W. Bush, a conservative Republican, , restricting fishing there, and President Barack Obama later expanded it. Trump, whose administration has made no secret of its aim to across the country's land , is now reopening much of the marine protected area to industrial-scale fishing.

The risks from industrial fishing

When too many fish are killed and too few young fish are left to replace them, it's considered overfishing, and this has become a growing problem around the world.

In 1974, about 10% of the world's fish stocks were overfished. By 2021, that number had risen to 37.7%, according to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization's annual .

Modern industrial-scale fishing practices can also harm other species.

Bycatch, or but are inadvertently caught up in nets and other gear, is . Many seabirds, sea turtles and whales die this way each year. Some types of fishing gear, such as trawls and dredges that drag along the sea floor to scoop up sea life, can itself.

Without regulations or protected areas, fishing can that can deplete fish stocks.

How marine protected areas protect species

Marine protected areas are designed to safeguard parts of the ocean from human impacts, including offshore oil and gas extraction and industrial fishing practices.

Studies have found that these areas can for both marine life and fishermen by allowing overfished species to recover and ensuring their health for the future.

A decade after Mexico established the Cabo Pulmo protected area, for example, fish biomass .

Successful marine protected areas tend to have healthier habitats, , more species of fish, and bigger fish than otherwise-similar unprotected areas. Studies have found the average size of organisms to be than in fished areas with no protections. How many babies a fish has is directly related to the size of the mother.

All of this helps outside the marine protected area.

Marine protected areas also have a ""—the offspring of healthy fish populations that spawn inside these areas often spread beyond them, helping fish populations outside the boundaries thrive as well.

Ultimately, the fishing industry benefits from a continuing supply. And all of this happens at little cost.

A need for more protected areas, not fewer

Claims by the Trump administration that marine protected areas are a heavy-handed restriction on the U.S. fishing industry do not hold water. As science and my own experience show, these refuges for sea life can instead help local economies and the industry by allowing fish populations to thrive.

For the future of the planet's whales, sea turtles, and the health of fishing itself, scientists like me recommend creating more marine protected areas to help species thrive, not dismantling them.

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .The Conversation

Citation: Trump is stripping protections from marine protected areas. Why that's a problem for fishing's future (2025, April 23) retrieved 27 May 2025 from /news/2025-04-trump-marine-areas-problem-fishing.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Big moms make big impact—half of the coral trout caught on Great Barrier Reef found to be from marine reserves

2 shares

Feedback to editors