Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


AI optimizes land use policy, finding hidden keys for better land use

With evolutionary AI, scientists find hidden keys for better land use
Using global land use and carbon storage data from the past 175 years, researchers at The University of Texas at Austin and Cognizant AI Labs have trained an artificial intelligence system to develop optimal environmental policy solutions that can advance global sustainability initiatives of the United Nations. Credit: University of Texas at Austin

Using global land use and carbon storage data from the past 175 years, researchers at The University of Texas at Austin and Cognizant AI Labs have trained an artificial intelligence system to develop optimal environmental policy solutions that can advance global sustainability initiatives of the United Nations.

The AI tool effectively balances various complex trade-offs to recommend ways of maximizing carbon storage, minimizing economic disruptions and helping improve the environment and people's everyday lives, according to a paper in the journal Environmental Data Science.

The project is among the first applications of the UN-backed Project Resilience, a team of scientists and experts working to tackle global decision-augmentation problems—including ambitious sustainable development goals this decade—through part of a broader effort called AI for Good.

University of Texas at Austin computer scientist Risto Miikkulainen, who helped launch Project Resilience, believes the new AI approach, initially focused on , can address an even larger set of challenges, from infectious diseases to food insecurity, with artificial intelligence potentially discovering better solutions than humans.

"There's always an outcome you want to optimize for, but there's always a cost," he said. Amid all of the trade-offs, AI can home in on unexpected pathways to desirable outcomes at various costs, helping leaders selectively pick battles and yield better results.

The secret sauce of the researchers' system is evolutionary AI. Inspired by the process of natural selection in , this computational approach starts with a few dozen policy scenarios and predicts how each scenario will impact various economic and environmental costs.

Then, like a digital version of survival of the fittest, policy combinations that don't balance the trade-offs well are killed off, while the best ones are allowed to reproduce, giving rise to hybrid offspring.

Random mutations are also sprinkled in to help the system explore novel combinations faster. The process then repeats, winnowing poor performers and keeping the best, across hundreds or thousands of scenarios. Like , the "generations" of scenarios become ever-more optimized for a set of priorities.

With evolutionary AI, scientists find hidden keys for better land use
A suggested land-use change for a given location (screenshots from the demo at https://landuse.evolution.ml). The location is indicated by the red dot among the UK grid cells. One Evolved Prescriptor is chosen from the middle region of the Pareto front spanning minimal change and minimal ELUC. The current land use is shown on the left chart and the recommended one on the right chart, as well as the sliders on the left. This prescriptor recommends decreasing pasture and crops and increasing range and secondary forest, resulting in a 26.02 tC/ha decrease in carbon emissions with a 28.96% land-use change. The user can then select different solutions from the Pareto front and modify the sliders manually to explore alternatives. Credit: Environmental Data Science (2025). DOI: 10.1017/eds.2025.18

The team used two tools—a recently released and . First, they used this data to train a prediction model to correlate location, land use and carbon over time. Second, they developed a prescription model to help decision makers find optimal land-use strategies to reduce climate change.

The AI system's recommendations sometimes surprised the team. Although forests are known to be good at storing carbon, the AI prescription model offered a more nuanced approach than converting as much land as possible into forests, regardless of location. For example, it found that replacing crop land with forest is much more effective than replacing range land (which includes deserts and grasslands).

Also, generally, the same land use change at one latitude didn't yield the same benefits as at another latitude. Ultimately, the system recommended that larger changes should be allocated to locations where it matters more; in essence, it's more effective to pick your battles.

"You can obviously destroy everything and plant forests, and that would help mitigate climate change," said Daniel Young, a researcher at Cognizant AI Labs and a Ph.D. student at UT Austin. "But we would have destroyed rare habitats and our food supply and cities. So we need to find a balance and be smart about where we make changes."

The researchers have turned their model into an like legislators can use to explore how incentives, such as tax credits for landowners, would be likely to alter land use and reduce carbon.

Land use activities, including agriculture and forestry are estimated to be responsible for nearly a quarter of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. Experts believe smart land use changes will be needed to reduce the amount of carbon in the air and thereby slow . According to Miikkulainen and Young, AI offers options that people, businesses and governments otherwise resistant to change may find easier to accept.

at a major machine learning and computational neuroscience conference, NeurIPS, where it won the "Best Pathway to Impact" award at the Climate Change workshop.

The other authors on the paper are Olivier Francon, Elliot Meyerson, Clemens Schwingshackl, Jakob Bieker, Hugo Cunha and Babak Hodjat.

More information: Daniel Young et al, Discovering effective policies for land-use planning with neuroevolution, Environmental Data Science (2025).

Citation: AI optimizes land use policy, finding hidden keys for better land use (2025, May 19) retrieved 21 May 2025 from /news/2025-05-ai-optimizes-policy-hidden-keys.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Countries could use forests to 'mask' needed emission cuts: Report

62 shares

Feedback to editors