Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


A chance discovery of a 350 million-year-old fossil reveals a new type of ray-finned fish

A chance discovery of a 350 million-year-old fossil reveals a new type of ray-finned fish
Comparing the jawbones of Sphyragnathus, Austelliscus and Tegeolepis. Credit: C. Wilson,

In 2015, two members of the in Nova Scotia found a long, curved fossil jaw, bristling with teeth. Sonja Wood, the museum's owner, and Chris Mansky, the museum's curator, found the fossil in a creek after Wood had a hunch.

The fossil they found belonged to a fish that had died 350 million years ago, its bony husk spanning nearly a meter on the lake bed. The large fish had lived in waters thick with rival fish, including giants several times its size. It had hooked at the tip of its long jaw that it would use to trap elusive prey and fangs at the back to pierce it and break it down to eat.

For the last eight years, I have been part of a team under the lead of paleontologist Jason Anderson, who has spent of Nova Scotia, northwest of Halifax, in collaboration with . Much of this work has been on the tetrapods——but my research focuses on what Blue Beach fossils can tell us about how the modern vertebrate world formed.

Birth of the modern vertebrate world

The modern vertebrate world is defined by the dominance of three groups: the or (including sharks, rays and chimeras), the lobe-finned fishes or sarcopterygians (including tetrapods and and ), and the or (including everything from sturgeon to tuna). Only a few jawless fishes .

This basic grouping has remained —at least for the last .

Before then, the vertebrate world was a lot more crowded. In the ancient vertebrate world, during the for example, the ancestors of modern vertebrates swam alongside , fishy sarcopterygians, and .

Armored jawless fishes by the , but the rest were still diverse. Actinopterygians were still restricted to a few species with similar body shapes.

By the immediately succeeding early Carboniferous times, . The placoderms were gone, the number of species of fishy sarcopterygians and acanthodians had cratered, and actinopterygians and chondrichthyans were flourishing in their place.

The was born.

A sea change

Blue Beach has helped build our understanding of how this happened. Studies describing its and have showed the persistence of Devonian-style forms in the Carboniferous Period.

Whereas the abrupt end-Devonian decline of the placoderms, acanthodians and fishy sarcopterygians can be explained by a , it now appears that multiple types of actinopterygians and tetrapods survived to be preserved at Blue Beach. This makes a big difference to the overall story: Devonian-style tetrapods and actinopterygians .

But significant questions remain for paleontologists. One point of debate revolves around how actinopterygians diversified as the modern vertebrate world was born—.

The Blue Beach fossil was actinopterygian, and we wondered what it could tell us about this issue. Comparison was difficult. Two actinopterygians with long jaws and large fangs were known from the preceding Devonian Period ( and ), but the newly found jaw had more extreme curvature and the arrangement of its teeth. Its largest fangs are at the back of its jaw, but the largest fangs of Austelliscus and Tegeolepis are at the front.

These differences were significant enough that we created a new genus and species: Sphyragnathus tyche. And, in view of the debate on actinopterygian diversification, we made a prediction: that the differences in anatomy between Sphyragnathus and Devonian actinopterygians represented different adaptations for feeding.

Front fangs

To test this prediction, we compared Sphyragnathus, Austelliscus and Tegeolepis to living actinopterygians. In modern actinopterygians, the difference in anatomy reflects a difference in function: front-fangs capture prey with their front teeth and grip it with their back teeth, but .

Since we couldn't observe the fossil fish in action, . The back teeth of Sphyragnathus handled force with low stress, making them suited for a role in piercing prey, but the back teeth of Austelliscus and Tegeolepis turned low forces into significantly higher stress, making them best suited for gripping.

We concluded that Sphyragnathus was the earliest actinopterygian adapted for breaking down prey by piercing, which also matches the .

Substantial work remains—only the jaw of Sphyragnathus is preserved, so the "locomotion-first" hypothesis was untested. But this represents the challenge and promise of paleontology: get enough tantalizing glimpses into the past and you can begin to unfold a history.

As for the actinopterygians, current research indicates that they first and shifted into new roles when .

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .The Conversation

Citation: A chance discovery of a 350 million-year-old fossil reveals a new type of ray-finned fish (2025, June 25) retrieved 11 August 2025 from /news/2025-06-chance-discovery-million-year-fossil.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

An evolutionary trade-off has limited how fish catch their prey

0 shares

Feedback to editors