Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


Systemic sexism in academia: New study outlines the structural hurdles facing women

STEM education
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

A collective of four female researchers from Canada, Argentina, and Germany has recently a study in the journal BioScience exposing the systemic barriers women face in the early stages of their academic careers—particularly in STEM subjects. Their study, "Systemic Sexism in Academia—An Early Career Viewpoint," presents a stark critique of academia's gendered challenges and proposes actionable solutions to dismantle them.

The study identifies four major obstacles that disproportionately hinder women in academia:

  1. Fostered intellectual insecurity: Women frequently contend with condescension ("mansplaining"), dismissive recognition of their achievements, and even harassment. This leads to "impostorization"—a systemic undermining of confidence that goes deeper than mere self-doubt.
  2. Exclusion from the "Boys' Club": Male-dominated networks often sideline women, limiting access to mentorship, collaboration, and professional visibility, forcing many to work twice as hard to prove their worth.
  3. Higher risks and additional challenges in fieldwork: Women face heightened safety risks during fieldwork, from sexual harassment to logistical hurdles, while also battling skepticism over the necessity of protective measures.
  4. Gendered expectations and emotional labor: Unequal caregiving and domestic responsibilities create a mental load that saps productivity, forcing many women to choose between personal and professional fulfillment.

The authors suggest a range of structural measures for achieving more in academia, including gender-inclusive appointment procedures, improved opportunities to balance research with , and effective antidiscrimination guidelines. Specifically, they propose three reforms:

  1. Strengthen representation and leadership opportunities: Implement gender-balanced quotas, blind peer reviews, and the formal recognition of "invisible labor" (mentorship, service work) in career promotions.
  2. Restructure career support systems: Guarantee paid , on-campus childcare, flexible schedules, and adjusted workloads to level the playing field.
  3. Foster accountability and allyship: Enforce anti-harassment policies, integrate diversity, equity, and inclusion into institutional culture, and train bystanders to challenge discrimination in daily interactions.

"Despite making up nearly half of early-career researchers, women are still underrepresented in STEM leadership. This study is a rallying cry for universities, funding bodies, and policymakers to confront the systemic biases women face. The solutions offered are not just about fairness but about strengthening academia by retaining diverse talent," says Piquer-Rodríguez.

More information: Olivia del Giorgio et al, Systemic sexism in academia: an early-career viewpoint, BioScience (2025).

Journal information: BioScience

Citation: Systemic sexism in academia: New study outlines the structural hurdles facing women (2025, June 17) retrieved 26 June 2025 from /news/2025-06-sexism-academia-outlines-hurdles-women.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

There has been progress in gender equality, but female university professors still face obstacles

0 shares

Feedback to editors