Âé¶¹ÒùÔº

May 19, 2025

Tories get ghosted: New study shows dating app users are more likely to swipe right on Reform voters

Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain
× close
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

The Conservative party is in existential crisis over the electoral threat posed by Reform UK. But a recent experiment shows that not only is the new rightwing party usurping the old guard in the polls—it's also eclipsing the Tories on the dating market.

In recent local elections, Reform took control of 10 councils in England, adding 677 councilors. The Conservatives, meanwhile, lost 674 councilors and control of 16 councils.

Over on the love market, a recent I co-authored shows people were more likely to swipe right ("like" or indicate interest) for a Reform voter than a Tory. While Reform voters had a 39% chance of a match, Conservatives had 35%.

The parties of the left and center had the highest match rates overall, with Labor supporters having a 52% chance of a match, Greens on 51% and Liberal Democrats on 49%.

These results come from a behavioral experiment involving 2,000 people in Britain. We asked participants to evaluate online dating profiles to see how politics shapes a person's chances of getting a match.

Participants were shown AI-generated dating profiles—more than 20,000 in total—and asked to swipe left ("dislike") or right ("like"). The profiles varied randomly across characteristics like looks, ethnicity, job, hobbies and, most importantly, .

Some profiles expressed support for mainstream parties—Labor, Conservatives, Greens, Lib Dems as well as rightwing newcomer, Reform UK.

What really stood out in was how much dating preferences followed political lines. People weren't necessarily put off by more extreme views—but they were more likely to reject someone from the opposite side of the political spectrum.

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters — to customize your preferences!

The politics of dating polarizes. Conservative voters would rather date someone further to their right (Reform) and Labor voters would rather date someone further to their left (the Greens) than cross the Labor-Conservative divide in the center.

While people tend to prefer partners who vote for the same party as them, they also prefer partners who belong to the same left and right "."

Dating preferences were heavily split along the left-right divide, with leftwing voters 37% more likely to reject someone on the right than vice-versa. This explains, in part, why rightwing people are less popular on dating apps overall, compared with leftwing people.

Given that the population of dating app users tends to be (and therefore ), the politics penalty is skewed against rightwing folks. In effect, the "number of fish in the sea" willing to date them is smaller than the number they themselves are willing to date.

Men and women reacted largely in a similar way. There's often talk of a in rightwing support—particularly among . But we found no evidence that women were any more or less likely than men to swipe left on Reform UK supporters.

So, the Conservatives are not only at risk of electoral annihilation thanks to the Reform threat. They're also denying their supporters dates. In a dating world shaped more by political alignment than ideological distance, the chances of success depend less on what someone believes—and more on which side they're on.

Provided by The Conversation

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
trusted source
written by researcher(s)
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

Analysis of dating app behavior in Britain indicates users are more likely to match with Reform UK supporters (39%) than Conservatives (35%), while left-leaning parties have the highest match rates (Labour 52%, Greens 51%, Lib Dems 49%). Dating preferences align strongly with political camps, with leftwing users 37% more likely to reject rightwing profiles. Gender differences were negligible.

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.