Lessons from a historic quest to heal spider bites are helping to fight neglected tropical diseases today

Sadie Harley
scientific editor

Robert Egan
associate editor

The bite of a black widow spider can initially feel like a sharp stabbing pain, or it can be deceptively subtle, barely registering notice. But as the spider's potent neurotoxin courses through the bloodstream, some unlucky human victims begin to develop severe symptoms. Within about an hour, the venom can cause widespread body pain, stiffness and muscle spasms, or trouble breathing.
While most people recover within a day or two, it can be a harrowing experience. Luckily, antivenom is available to help reverse the effects of the spider's toxin. But that hasn't always been the case.
The first antivenom for black widow spider bites was developed in the United States in 1936. Before that time, serious illness or even death were more common, especially among children and older people, who are especially susceptible to the spider's toxin. And tragically, deaths continued across Latin America for many years more because of lack of access to the new antivenom medications.
Things changed in the mid-1940s in Argentina, when a dedicated rural school teacher and a brave group of women set out on an ambitious two-year campaign to collect 40,000 black widow spiders.
They carefully captured and packed the spiders in test tubes and mailed them off to researchers in the medical school at Universidad de Buenos Aires, who synthesized their own antivenom. As a result, the medicine finally became available in Argentina and served as a model for other laboratories and pharmaceutical operations in Latin America.
The name of the school teacher who helped make it all happen was Jorge Washington Ábalos. His often-overlooked story is now being brought to light in a by UC Santa Cruz Latin American and Latino Studies Associate Professor Lily Balloffet for the Journal of the History of Biology.
Balloffet has been conducting extensive research on the history of antivenom production in Latin America. She sees Ábalos's story as an early example of a developing model for pharmaceutical autonomy that would later become replicated across the region for successfully dealing with snakebites.
Globally, snakebites remain a World Health Organization designated "neglected tropical disease," so lessons from Latin America are crucial for charting the path forward.
Public health advances led by everyday people
The history of black widow antivenom production in Argentina shows how major advances in medicine can come from unlikely places. Beginning in the mid-1930s, Ábalos was a school teacher in the Gran Chaco region of Argentina, one of the country's most rural areas.
He had a natural interest in zoology and learned a great deal from the Indigenous families in the region, including traditional ecological knowledge and how to speak the native language of Quechua. He cared deeply about his students and became concerned with their health.
"He saw day-to-day cases where students or their family members got stung by scorpions or bitten by snakes or spiders," Balloffet explained.
"He was someone who was already interested in natural flora and fauna, but above all, he was a concerned teacher, and seeing the effects on his students was a real impetus for him to start to apply those interests from a public health perspective."
Staff at the nearest medical clinic put Ábalos in touch with a prominent physician and epidemiologist who was studying diseases caused by insect bites and animal venoms.
From there, he connected with researchers across the country and began providing blood draws, soil samples, and animal specimens from the Gran Chaco region to support public health advances.
To develop black widow antivenom, Ábalos recruited local families to the cause, particularly women who were looking to make some extra income. Ábalos and his army of spider collectors were essentially doing what's now called "community science," where people without formal scientific training make crucial contributions to scientific data collection efforts.
The impact of Ábalos's work extended beyond antivenom production, too. One of his other major projects was collecting vinchuca, or "kissing bugs" (Triatoma infestans), which transmit a life-threatening infection called Chagas disease that had been discovered in Brazil in 1909.
Vinchuca insects often lived in the thatched roofs, adobe walls, and dirt floors of rural dwellings in the Gran Chaco, so Ábalos collected many specimens across the community, along with blood samples from people and animals infected with Chagas disease. Those efforts offered key epidemiological data for researchers who were pathologically profiling Chagas disease and tracking the extent of its reach across Argentina.
"Chagas disease is still a serious public health problem across the Americas, , so this early work to understand the epidemiology was crucial," Balloffet says.
"If Chagas disease is diagnosed early, it can be treated with the right medications, but if it's missed, it can cause catastrophic heart problems later in life, which was a huge problem in Ábalos's time and remains a major issue today."
A global model for pharmaceutical autonomy
The successes of Ábalos's work demonstrate a unique model for public health research that emerged across Latin America, where regional scientific institutions worked with local community groups to address neglected tropical diseases.
"Neglected tropical diseases are often referred to as 'diseases of poverty' because they are mostly curable, but getting research investment in them from pharmaceutical companies in the Global North or access to existing medications has historically not happened, largely for financial reasons," Balloffet explained.
That's why researchers and communities across Latin America have worked to produce their own antivenom formulations, dating all the way back to the turn of the century. Instead of relying on foreign pharmaceutical companies, they have built locally grown research and development enterprises and production and distribution capacities, which helps keep antivenoms in stock and affordable.
One modern lab in Costa Rica that Balloffet has been studying for several years even does unpatented research work to develop and share insights on venomous animals from other regions of the globe. The lab has been consulting with countries from across the Global South to teach others how to build their own antivenom production facilities.
"Today, Latin America is a region that successfully produces all the antivenom it needs on its own, which is a real outlier in the Global South," Balloffet said. "Latin America is completely pharmaceutically autonomous for antivenom, so it's really important to understand how that came about in order to support other regions that are still struggling to treat snake bites."
Balloffet is currently working on a book that will explore that history in full detail. Ábalos's story is a key part of that project and offers a preview of some important takeaways.
"What history shows us is that it's not a top-down public health approach that is the answer to mitigating the impacts of bites from venomous animals," Balloffet said.
"It's about integrating pharmaceutical development, outreach, and education to engage communities. I see that horizontal approach as the core of Ábalos's story, and it demonstrates the importance of everyday people who became invested in these public health projects."
More information: Lily Balloffet, Environment, Tropical Disease, and Scientific Networks in Argentina: Folclore and Multiscalar Mobilities, Journal of the History of Biology (2025).
Provided by University of California - Santa Cruz